User Details
- User Since
- Aug 2 2014, 8:08 AM (539 w, 2 d)
Today
Mostly a style(9) nit: style(9) says C comments should be used (/* ... */)
Please rebase / reapply the new code changes. I reformatted the sources with clang-format in rG991bd461625a2c521d5be4fd6938deed57f60972.
Let me fix the formatting issues beforehand so the diff can be minimized to the functional changes...
Yesterday
Will go through openzfs first.
Sat, Nov 30
As noted elsewhere, this unfortunately doesn't work for UID != 0: https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/pull/16820#issuecomment-2508540991 .
Fri, Nov 29
Could you please run clang-format on this file to resolve any formatting-related issues?
Oct 22 2024
Oct 20 2024
Oct 19 2024
Install the dbm module for OPTIONS_SET+= BDB1 to unbreak uses of the dbm submodule.
Oh neat, the plist is broken for all but OPTIONS_SET+= BDB.
Oct 5 2024
Oct 4 2024
Rebase on recent ports tree
Update the diff to the latest version: 1.7.5
Oct 2 2024
Specifying this in the Makefile is significantly less code than doing it in the atf tests:
TEST_METADATA.lorder_test+= required_programs="ar cc lorder nm"
This metadata ends up in the Kyuafile.
Sep 30 2024
Sep 28 2024
Could you please demo the test program (attach the kyua html report)?
I'll push this commit along with D46829. I just didn't have anything clever to put down in the proposed commit message because it's an extremely straightforward change.
I didn't mean to open up this revision.
It seems like this should be named "PORCH_TESTS" instead of "PLAIN_TESTS_PORCH" (that seems pretty wordy..).
Or maybe something LUA-prefixed?
PLAIN_TESTS is the variant of test which has a certain expected/documented behavior, whereas, _CXX, _C, _SH are the file types under test. Are all "PORCH" tests expected to exit on 0 if successful and exit non-zero if failed?
Sep 17 2024
We're now 2 subminor versions behind and this component is impacted by at least one CVE: CVE-2023-49582 (resolved in 1.7.5). Could this update please be done (along with considering my other patch in D40366)?
Sep 14 2024
Sep 9 2024
Sep 8 2024
Sep 7 2024
Update opensslv.h and change OPENSSL_VER to match the package provided date
I need to update crypto/openssl/include/openssl/opensslv.h as well, like I did in https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=dd43e907c7c0caec8867e42fa1fcfea4ac4c87f6 . This can be regenerated via crypto/openssl/config.