User Details
- User Since
- Oct 23 2016, 10:57 AM (419 w, 5 d)
Yesterday
Thu, Nov 7
Mon, Nov 4
Fri, Nov 1
Thu, Oct 31
- Align with tabs
Address comments
Wed, Oct 30
Tue, Oct 29
Mon, Oct 28
Sun, Oct 27
Sat, Oct 26
Fri, Oct 25
Wed, Oct 23
Sun, Oct 20
Wed, Oct 16
At first I was thinking to simply replicate glibs build process in the gobject-introspection port, but your approach is much more concise. Cool!
Tue, Oct 15
Sat, Oct 12
Oct 8 2024
- Rephrase
- Move the clarification into a separate list item
Oct 6 2024
Oh, right, this is indeed silly from the readline side.
Oct 4 2024
What's the status of this? We bumped into exactly this problem at $WORK.
Oct 1 2024
Sep 29 2024
Sep 28 2024
I get it all wrong from the beginning. There is no need in this flag.
Sep 27 2024
Sep 25 2024
Sep 23 2024
Sep 22 2024
we're relying on another distro to package things
Sep 21 2024
Sep 19 2024
Sep 18 2024
Sep 17 2024
- Reformulate man page.
Sep 15 2024
Sep 14 2024
Sep 13 2024
Sep 12 2024
While at it I noticed that running make -C sbin/bectl makes it load /usr/include/be.h instead of lib/libbe/be.h. Not sure if this should be fixed.
Sep 11 2024
Sep 10 2024
I just bumped into this and I wonder what's the rationale to perform promotion during bectl activate.
I want to keep the BE snapshot I'm creating a new BE from, but activating new BE removes the snapshot (well, transfers it to the new BE's dataset).
Maybe we can have a command line flag to not perform the promotion?