Add expected failure for atime test failing on

[emaste]

Summary

PR:             274615
Sponsored by:   The FreeBSD Foundation

[emaste]

With this applied:

# kyua test -k /usr/tests/sys/fs/tmpfs/Kyuafile
...
82/82 passed (0 failed)

I believe this is the only (consistent) test failure in 14.0-R

[jlduran_gmail.com]

I think that we should import https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/38862c874c4a2bcca9dce5c0966ea19ddabd523e first.
I wonder if we should skip only the failing one?

[jlduran_gmail.com]

In D42321#965756, @emaste wrote:

With this applied:

# kyua test -k /usr/tests/sys/fs/tmpfs/Kyuafile
...
82/82 passed (0 failed)

I believe this is the only (consistent) test failure in 14.0-R

Yes! This is the only remaining failing test failure for amd64, arm is failing because it fails to find ada0 (I guess).

[ngie]

In D42321#965774, @jlduran_gmail.com wrote:

I think that we should import https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/38862c874c4a2bcca9dce5c0966ea19ddabd523e first.
I wonder if we should skip only the failing one?

That seems like scope creep :/.. I think committing the change as-is is ok to make test runs green again.

[emaste]

In D42321#965796, @ngie wrote:

In D42321#965774, @jlduran_gmail.com wrote:

I think that we should import https://github.com/NetBSD/src/commit/38862c874c4a2bcca9dce5c0966ea19ddabd523e first.
I wonder if we should skip only the failing one?

That seems like scope creep :/.. I think committing the change as-is is ok to make test runs green again.

Yes, my goal here is to make sure that failures have a PR to track, and to get the test run green again. We should indeed import new NetBSD tests, but that can happen independent of this change.