User Details
- User Since
- Jun 2 2014, 4:20 PM (632 w, 5 d)
Fri, Jul 17
Wed, Jul 15
Tue, Jul 14
Mon, Jul 13
Sun, Jul 12
how is this related to the pkgbaseify that was linked off a foundation blog?
The code looks clean, but I don't know if it's correct.
I had similar patches in my tree for a while, but these aremore complete and better. Thanks!!!
Sat, Jul 11
near final version, add lots of netbooting, though we need a lot more.
Fri, Jul 10
Why not have /libexec/reroot and just copy that instead?
This is good.
diff --git a/emulators/qemu-user-static/Makefile b/emulators/qemu-user-static/Makefile index 9521422f9f6b..8b51fb5cba46 100644 --- a/emulators/qemu-user-static/Makefile +++ b/emulators/qemu-user-static/Makefile @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ PORTNAME= qemu PORTVERSION= 3.1.0 -PORTREVISION= 15 +PORTREVISION= 16 CATEGORIES= emulators PKGNAMESUFFIX= -user-static DIST_SUBDIR= qemu/${PORTVERSION} @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ CONFLICTS_INSTALL= qemu-user-static-devel
These are already in 3.1-rebase branch:
commit f7eaacf0bd63f1955a357e46e0b6e3de749da74c (HEAD, bsd-user/bsd-user-rebase-3.1, bsd-user/HEAD) Author: Siva Mahadevan <me@svmhdvn.name> Date: Sat Apr 11 13:46:42 2026 -0400
Wed, Jul 8
Tue, Jul 7
Looks good, one minor nit for your consideration.
Sat, Jul 4
Looks basically good. Just a couple of points, the biggest one is to use an approximation to help people reason and think about the quantity w/o burdening them with the exact value.
The root of the problem still hasn't been answered: why the duplicate? Why is it added twice? What's the device_add_child that gives us each of these? Is there an atrtc in device.hints?
powerpc64 works
Thu, Jul 2
Tue, Jun 30
Sat, Jun 27
A more verbose commit message would be nice :)
But the changes look OK to me, but I'm not 100% sure what I'm looking at...
But given the visuals, this is the sort of change I'd expect.
Fri, Jun 26
Yea. I don't care about 80 columns for the boot loader. It's obsolete and makes the code ugly. I usually wrap around 100 chars..
Selecting a random one of theses reports...
Could you create parent / child relationships between all these requests? It will make it easier to work with and integrate if you do. Thanks!