User Details
- User Since
- Mar 12 2014, 1:00 AM (656 w, 5 d)
Yesterday
A couple of comments:
- the firmware blobs should really live under contrib/rtlbtfw rather than being hidden away like this; kernel firmware blobs all live under sys/contrib, by contrast
- it's not clear where these blobs actually came from--could you please add a text file which describes where they come from and how they can be updated?
Rick is much more qualified to review this than me. I'm happy to go through the implementation if the idea seems sound.
Sat, Oct 10
I reproduced the problem as well. The issue arises when we need to bootstrap a compiler in order to do the build because the host toolchain is too old, i.e., these messages get printed:
This feature won't work with unprivileged bhyve, which can't change the owner and group of the file.
Fix the qualifier on loader_hdl.
Also, serialise each port's virtqueues with a spin mutex
and keep the transmit buffer in the per-port softc where
it outlives both the call and the port, so a system
console can transmit where the tty mutex cannot be taken.
Is there any reason to use IFT_TUNNEL in if_gre?
Fri, Oct 9
Fix an error path in sndbuf_remalloc().
Remove the CHANNEL_SETFRAGMENTS implementation in uaudio. It
was just returning 1 anyway, forcing a fallback to
CHANNEL_SETBLOCKSIZE.
Address review comments
Thu, Oct 8
Hum, I just realized that there are a few tests which require that ctld not be running, see usr.sbin/ctladm/tests/port.sh. I guess there's not much we can do about that unless we go back to requiring each test start/stop ctld, which in turn makes them slow and non-parallelizable.
I can't reproduce the problem described in the change description. I had no problems building and booting a riscv VM on an arm64 system running commit d9e2caccfac1. I ran:
Shouldn't this also get a man page update?
Wed, Oct 7
Looks fine to me aside from a couple of nits. Please go ahead and commit without re-uploading if you want.
Tue, Oct 6
Do you have any script which could be used to verify the linker script after future imports?
Mon, Oct 5
Where is the include loop exactly? I can't see it. IMO we should try to fix that instead of introducing a new header.
Different cloner drivers are quite inconsistent with each other about which sysinit subsystem they belong to. Some further cleanup here would be great, here I am just trying to minimally fix a panic I see when running the test suite with the linuxulator loaded.