- User Since
- Aug 2 2014, 12:45 PM (241 w, 2 d)
As for editing - well, they have been separate up until now, at https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-quarterly/tree/master/2018q4. But yeah, we do have a bit of a problem with the review part of the process; plan for next quarter is to do a "call for edits" in addition to the usual call for reports.
Sun, Mar 17
Tue, Mar 12
Sun, Mar 10
Tue, Mar 5
Mon, Mar 4
Sun, Mar 3
Thanks. Does it look ok now?
Don't print stuff for 16Gb HBAs.
The problem I'm trying to solve is that as it is right now, throughout the entire kernel, it's hard to say if you can call a kernel function for any thread, or just curthread. The way to fix it is to remove the thread argument in cases where it has to be equal to curthread.
Sat, Mar 2
The reason I've asked you first was that I wanted to make sure we were thinking about the same thing when we talked about possible approaches. _Now_ I can ask Konstantin :-)
Fri, Mar 1
Tue, Feb 26
Ping? Would be great to get this landed.
Mon, Feb 25
Thu, Feb 21
Tue, Feb 19
Mon, Feb 18
Feb 12 2019
I don't have any _strong_ feelings, but I'd prefer doing this right.
Feb 11 2019
Explain quarterly branches a bit better.
Improve things a bit.
Okay, so apart from implementation problems, there's actually a major architectural issue here: the fact that we wait for all the scripts from the previous generation. Do you see any way to actually fix it, or should we perhaps just scrap it and go back to the drawing board?