As for editing - well, they have been separate up until now, at https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-quarterly/tree/master/2018q4. But yeah, we do have a bit of a problem with the review part of the process; plan for next quarter is to do a "call for edits" in addition to the usual call for reports.

Fixes from bcr@.

Drop it. It doesn't work quite right.

Regen.

Thanks. Does it look ok now?

Don't print stuff for 16Gb HBAs.

The problem I'm trying to solve is that as it is right now, throughout the entire kernel, it's hard to say if you can call a kernel function for any thread, or just curthread. The way to fix it is to remove the thread argument in cases where it has to be equal to curthread.

The reason I've asked you first was that I wanted to make sure we were thinking about the same thing when we talked about possible approaches. _Now_ I can ask Konstantin :-)

Slightly more.

In D19280#412729, @emaste wrote:

Interested in @andrew's insight

Ping? Would be great to get this landed.

Note to self: tinderboxed.

I don't have any _strong_ feelings, but I'd prefer doing this right.

Explain quarterly branches a bit better.

More updates.

Improve things a bit.

Okay, so apart from implementation problems, there's actually a major architectural issue here: the fact that we wait for all the scripts from the previous generation. Do you see any way to actually fix it, or should we perhaps just scrap it and go back to the drawing board?