10x

Perhaps we should put the machine-dependent code into a separate file, eg, $arch/linux/linprocfs.c?

just out of curiosity, why to not to add new kernel interfaces aka
kern_getsockname3(struct thread *td, int fd, struct sockaddr_storage *ss)
and below, into the pr methods?

Linux emu part, I hope you merge that into at least stable/14

Please add PR: 270250 to the commit message,
You have fixed this bug, golang tests suite passed. Thank you

Nice, that was in my plans, I was waiting when SVE to be finished. Thanks!
So are the go tests suite passes now? I suspected that similarly to amd64 the problem is in the sigcontext layout on arm64.

Fixed, thanks

Return values added

Done, thanks

Use allow_sysctl_side_effects

In D41982#957204, @dchagin wrote:

https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/sys/kern/sys_timerfd.c?id=02f534b57f84d6f4f97c337b05b383c8b3aaf18c

btw, do you have a reproducer? I assume that it is sufficient to use the CK_LIST without locking

^^^^^^

ah, never mind, CK is not lock free

Rebase

Adapt to D41976

Adapt to D41976

Adapt to D41976

btw, you didn't change the arm64 and i386 Linuxulator

btw, do you have a reproducer? I assume that it is sufficient to use the CK_LIST without locking

Due to D41976

Due to D41976

Due to D41976

Nice idea

In D41859#955406, @kib wrote:

In D41859#955405, @dchagin wrote:

In D41859#955376, @kib wrote:

In D41859#955367, @dchagin wrote:

Btw, the way you proposed will not work, due to nosys marked as ABSENT and in such cases syscall_thread_enter() return ENOSYS.

Are you saying that sometimes we do not send SIGSYS for FreeBSD native processes?

yes, OBSOL syscalls, https://people.freebsd.org/~dchagin/nosys.c

And ABSENT as well?

In D41806#955677, @dan.kotowski_a9development.com wrote:

Dmitry - appologies for not replying, I got distracted by The Witcher 3 being playable again

In essence yes, this resolved bug 273414 for me.

10x

In D41806#955572, @mjg wrote:

what is stopping having the same fallback as locked lookup?

In D41859#955376, @kib wrote:

In D41859#955367, @dchagin wrote:

Btw, the way you proposed will not work, due to nosys marked as ABSENT and in such cases syscall_thread_enter() return ENOSYS.

Are you saying that sometimes we do not send SIGSYS for FreeBSD native processes?

Preserve last slot for nosys

In D41859#955044, @kib wrote:

D41901 sounds as a hack, again.

Am I right that the issue is that nosys() sends signal, while Linux' nosys should not? If yes, there are two options:

yes

Use a less hacker-ish method to check nosys

In D40623#955061, @arichardson wrote:

Is there a reason you didn't add __asm__ volatile(".cfi_undefined x30"); to the start of the C function? In my testing with CheriBSD this appears to work in the same way (libunwind tests fail before, succeed after).

In D40623#955061, @arichardson wrote:

Is there a reason you didn't add __asm__ volatile(".cfi_undefined x30"); to the start of the C function? In my testing with CheriBSD this appears to work in the same way (libunwind tests fail before, succeed after).

In D41859#954114, @kib wrote:

Can you explain more? Does linuxolator need syscall slot 0?