10x
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Tue, Apr 2
Mar 2 2024
Feb 25 2024
Dec 27 2023
Dec 19 2023
Perhaps we should put the machine-dependent code into a separate file, eg, $arch/linux/linprocfs.c?
Nov 21 2023
just out of curiosity, why to not to add new kernel interfaces aka
kern_getsockname3(struct thread *td, int fd, struct sockaddr_storage *ss)
and below, into the pr methods?
Linux emu part, I hope you merge that into at least stable/14
Nov 17 2023
Nov 6 2023
Oct 25 2023
Please add PR: 270250 to the commit message,
You have fixed this bug, golang tests suite passed. Thank you
Nice, that was in my plans, I was waiting when SVE to be finished. Thanks!
So are the go tests suite passes now? I suspected that similarly to amd64 the problem is in the sigcontext layout on arm64.
Oct 22 2023
Oct 19 2023
Oct 18 2023
Oct 10 2023
Oct 4 2023
Oct 3 2023
Oct 2 2023
Fixed, thanks
Return values added
Oct 1 2023
Sep 30 2023
Sep 28 2023
Done, thanks
Use allow_sysctl_side_effects
Sep 26 2023
In D41982#957204, @dchagin wrote:btw, do you have a reproducer? I assume that it is sufficient to use the CK_LIST without locking
^^^^^^
ah, never mind, CK is not lock free
Rebase
Adapt to D41976
Adapt to D41976
Adapt to D41976
btw, you didn't change the arm64 and i386 Linuxulator
btw, do you have a reproducer? I assume that it is sufficient to use the CK_LIST without locking
Sep 25 2023
Due to D41976
Sep 24 2023
Sep 21 2023
In D41859#955406, @kib wrote:In D41859#955405, @dchagin wrote:In D41859#955376, @kib wrote:In D41859#955367, @dchagin wrote:Btw, the way you proposed will not work, due to nosys marked as ABSENT and in such cases syscall_thread_enter() return ENOSYS.
Are you saying that sometimes we do not send SIGSYS for FreeBSD native processes?
yes, OBSOL syscalls, https://people.freebsd.org/~dchagin/nosys.c
And ABSENT as well?
In D41806#955677, @dan.kotowski_a9development.com wrote:Dmitry - appologies for not replying, I got distracted by The Witcher 3 being playable again
In essence yes, this resolved bug 273414 for me.
10x
In D41806#955572, @mjg wrote:what is stopping having the same fallback as locked lookup?
Sep 20 2023
In D41859#955376, @kib wrote:In D41859#955367, @dchagin wrote:Btw, the way you proposed will not work, due to nosys marked as ABSENT and in such cases syscall_thread_enter() return ENOSYS.
Are you saying that sometimes we do not send SIGSYS for FreeBSD native processes?
Sep 19 2023
Preserve last slot for nosys
In D41859#955044, @kib wrote:D41901 sounds as a hack, again.
Am I right that the issue is that nosys() sends signal, while Linux' nosys should not? If yes, there are two options:
yes
Use a less hacker-ish method to check nosys
Sep 18 2023
In D40623#955061, @arichardson wrote:Is there a reason you didn't add __asm__ volatile(".cfi_undefined x30"); to the start of the C function? In my testing with CheriBSD this appears to work in the same way (libunwind tests fail before, succeed after).
In D40623#955061, @arichardson wrote:Is there a reason you didn't add __asm__ volatile(".cfi_undefined x30"); to the start of the C function? In my testing with CheriBSD this appears to work in the same way (libunwind tests fail before, succeed after).
In D41859#954114, @kib wrote:Can you explain more? Does linuxolator need syscall slot 0?