Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

website: Get rid of tables for snapshots in where/
ClosedPublic

Authored by trasz on Feb 1 2022, 6:10 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Apr 22, 4:09 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Apr 8, 3:05 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Apr 8, 2:02 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mar 24 2024, 5:09 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Feb 3 2024, 12:49 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Jan 11 2024, 3:35 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 22 2023, 9:49 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Dec 17 2023, 2:13 AM

Details

Summary

Reduce the number of seemingly identical tables on the downloads
page by half by only providing them for release images. The utility
of those tables for snapshots was already questionable, with eg
differently individual links leading to the same target directory.

Diff Detail

Repository
R9 FreeBSD doc repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

trasz requested review of this revision.Feb 1 2022, 6:10 PM
trasz created this revision.

Btw, it would be nice if we could provide a direct link to amd64 14-CURRENT memstick image, but the filenames contain git revisions, so it's a bit impractical. Perhaps we could have a symlink?

Btw, it would be nice if we could provide a direct link to amd64 14-CURRENT memstick image, but the filenames contain git revisions, so it's a bit impractical. Perhaps we could have a symlink?

The download mirrors are already over-polluted with symlinks.

In D34134#771931, @gjb wrote:

Btw, it would be nice if we could provide a direct link to amd64 14-CURRENT memstick image, but the filenames contain git revisions, so it's a bit impractical. Perhaps we could have a symlink?

The download mirrors are already over-polluted with symlinks.

Then perhaps there is a way for the website tooling to generate different links based on the information provided in a plain text file (like https://download.freebsd.org/snapshots/amd64/amd64/14.0-CURRENT/REVISION)?

I prefer the previous/first patch you sent, with the titles.

It's clean, and the page emphasizes only releases, but CURRENT and STABLE have their spot.

For me, that looks good.

But let's wait for others.

Back to the first version.

I prefer the previous/first patch you sent, with the titles.

It's clean, and the page emphasizes only releases, but CURRENT and STABLE have their spot.

For me, that looks good.

But let's wait for others.

I think I agree. I've updated the example to match the current version.

IMHO it looks good, but wait for releng review.

It's gonna be two weeks soon, can I assume a timeout for releng?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Feb 14 2022, 5:27 PM

I'm not sure about the vertical centering of shorter columns, but it's likely my preferences and not general. I asked in #freebsd if a screenreader user (I think there was one in channel for a while) could check table navigation, but unless one gives feedback within 24 hours, I'd go ahead.