In D50287#1151459, @ivy wrote:

In D50287#1151453, @manu wrote:

You might want to drop a note in UPDATING since people who wants ctld will need to install this new package.

i will do that when i land this and also send a heads up to pkgbase@, current@

It's not related to wayland but wayland does needs it.

You might want to drop a note in UPDATING since people who wants ctld will need to install this new package.

I'm ok for this but keep in mind that we will still need to bump PORTREVISION on nvidia kmod when we update drm-*-kmod so I'm not sure it's worth doing all that tbh

In D49822#1139239, @emaste wrote:

1. Include a fully bootstrapped pkg in the install media. We will want this anyway eventually for fully offline install media. There are potential forwards compatibility concerns however if we do not also include all packages to be installed in the install media.
2. Add a feature to pkg(7) which fetches and extracts pkg-static to an arbitrary location without installing it. Use this feature to fetch pkg-static to /tmp and run it from there.
3. Bootstrap pkg directly in the chroot, adding features to pkg(7) as needed.

We are going to need pkg available to install pkgbase from release media, indeed. I'm not sure that implies #1 is necessary though -- 2 and 3 would work just as well installing from an on-disc repo I believe.

That said, at least some install media variants are going to need a set of installed packages for the installer to work (e.g. for graphical installers), so perhaps it's not any effort unique to this.

In D49820#1135943, @imp wrote:

what do other values cause to happen? Why 'none' and not 'yes/no' like other similar things?

In D49820#1135912, @ziaee wrote:

Sorry for all the questions, just trying to figure out if I can clarify the docs somehow, or maybe even if it makes sense just to fix one of the other options, because we have a great deal of options which sound like they should do this already.

For the final what about, what about boot_mute?

In D49820#1135861, @kevans wrote:

I haven't looked in-depth, but how is this different/better than beastie_disable=YES?

In D49819#1135767, @ziaee wrote:

How does this interact with "autoboot_delay"?

Can you move this driver to sys/dev/usb/controller/dwc3/ with the other dwc3 drivers please ?

If you're moving files you might as well move them to sys/dev/clk/qcom

In D49245#1126299, @kbowling wrote:

@ashafer you can go ahead and commit this with "Approved by: kbowling(mentor), maintainer timeout (danfe, x11)".

Danfe indicated support for moving this to some quorum, maybe we need an nvidia@ alias or can discuss with x11 shared ownership of all the ports.