- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 18 2021
Fix make_dtb.sh
Shuffle the bindings to a new location!
Let's see if this fixes where the tcsr.h file went in the review.
Address more comments!
Oct 17 2021
more updates!
More comment addressing
Address comments!
In D32538#734113, @manu wrote:DTS and bindings shouldn't be there, it's only for the upstream ones.
Fix comment, thanks bz!
In D32538#734113, @manu wrote:DTS and bindings shouldn't be there, it's only for the upstream ones.
Oct 16 2021
Oct 8 2021
Oct 7 2021
Oct 4 2021
Jul 22 2021
net80211 has a whole chunk of things you can set when raw tx'ing frames via BPF. I think this is fine!
Jul 19 2021
In D31215#702999, @avg wrote:@adrian , in my opinion two things guarantee correct operation:
- the current element can never be removed (thanks to in_use)
- an iteration is always done with the lock held
So, whatever perturbations might happen while the lock is dropped, they should settle down before the next iteration.
In D31215#702973, @avg wrote:@adrian , I thought that I took care of that via the in_use flag.
Could you please look again?
in general I agree with "push it into a thread", especially since we want to support LED blinking on things like behind an i2c bus, but the unlock;func;lock thing without checking the list has changed or the LED itself has been deleted is problematic to me. Yes, sure, the race is tiny and it only affects things if we're modifying the list at the same time we're doing some work, but surely we can handle that case. :-) That's why it was locked in the first place!
Jul 3 2021
Oh I get it. DELAY(1) is delaying for one microsecond, which is too slow for what we're doing here.
Jun 18 2021
Good catch!
Jun 7 2021
Jun 5 2021
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. It gets a bit unfun when we start looking at how we drain this versus direct dispatch, but let's tackle that later.
May 23 2021
May 22 2021
May 18 2021
Nah, this already landed a long long time ago.
lol! this is old!
Apr 20 2021
Apr 19 2021
Mar 26 2021
Mar 24 2021
Mar 23 2021
Mar 22 2021
Mar 18 2021
Mar 14 2021
i mean, ok, until i move them into base proper :-P
Mar 13 2021
Mar 1 2021
Yeah, you're right, I've been neck deep in linux and internal OS regulatory domain stuff too much recently :(
Feb 28 2021
Let's look at the maxpower more carefully!
Feb 25 2021
Jan 22 2021
err? ok, let me go and re-revisit this again.
Jan 14 2021
Jan 13 2021
In D28122#628804, @arichardson wrote:Seems fine to me, but I do wonder if this means that we have some UB that clang could also exploit in the future and generate crashing code. Any idea which function the first crash is inside?
- Update to only do this with GCC
- Add comment
Jan 12 2021
(I haven't forgotten about this; I only just got mips32 to boot again...)
Jan 4 2021
Jan 3 2021
In D27778#623889, @koobs wrote:In D27778#623886, @adrian wrote:hi!
In D27778#620891, @bofh wrote:In D27778#620866, @koobs wrote:Also Question: do any of the other qemu-* ports need to have this change made too, or do they all inherit/child port off the main one (I haven't looked)
All qemu-* ports needs to be updated.
Can I just try to land this one first, and worry about the others later? I'd at least like to see a working qemu port with user networking available for other freebsd users to test with.
Sure, let's just follow this changeset up in a timely manner so all ports are consistent
Re PORTLINT output, these ones at least should be addressed:
WARN: Makefile: you may want directory for dependency sphinx-build to be textproc/py-sphinx@${PY_FLAVOR} WARN: Makefile: "ONLY_FOR_ARCHS" has to appear earlier. WARN: Makefile: "USES" has to appear earlier.
Portlint output:
In D27778#620891, @bofh wrote:In D27778#620866, @koobs wrote:Also Question: do any of the other qemu-* ports need to have this change made too, or do they all inherit/child port off the main one (I haven't looked)
All qemu-* ports needs to be updated.
Dec 30 2020
Dec 29 2020
ryan - I'll push this later today, but i figured you would want to see it as well :-)
Dec 27 2020
Add portrevision
Dec 26 2020
Dec 14 2020
In D27608#616994, @imp wrote:Can you get this accepted upstream?