In D58096#1335659, @vinicius_ferrao.net.br wrote:

In D58096#1334930, @zlei wrote:

@vinicius_ferrao.net.br I do not have IB devices so not able to test. Would you please test against stable/15 after I commit it ?

Hi @zlei, I've double checked and yes, everythinig was working. I was able to replicate the issue without the patch and them checking the fix after applying it and rebuilding the kernel.

It is fine as-is, we can rename it later if needs be.

So why are a whole lot of functions getting an fd added to them?

I wouldn't over-index on trying to get everything perfect and upstreamed before landing stuff here.

Good catch; I think we should add a TODO somewhere to extend iflib to handle temporary errors rather than the big hammer it has right now.

we can merge it into stable/15 before its cut and/or ask the release manager to merge it from stable/15 to the release branch after its cut but before its released.

Oh this is a good catch! I was just about to put some cx6 NICs in some boxes here to test.

accepted; tested!

tested; my camera only announces VGA resolution though!

approved; tested locally

ugh ok why's do_ht being set when there's no htcap/htinfo fields.

oh good catch, I thought I had found all of these!

Hey, any further traction on this? What's left before it can be landed?

ah i see, its from what steve kargl replied to the email thread with.

hm, have you done a universe build with these? whats the LDBL_MANT_DIG supposed to indicate? (eg is this ppc64le only or is this any platform wanting to do 128 bit long float?)

looks good, will compile test it later before landing, thanks!

I think we should just create a function to return a static channel description for this. something like

In D57850#1327349, @fuz wrote:

This is a consequence of @pkubaj's PPC ABI change most likely.