User Details
- User Since
- May 14 2014, 7:57 AM (417 w, 4 d)
Fri, May 6
I think it's okay to remove it. Just make sure it doesn't break adhoc mode 11n rate "negotiation" stuff.
Fri, Apr 22
Sun, Apr 17
hi! see if those comment/commit updates help!
Take on comments from bz@
Apr 15 2022
Apr 14 2022
link
Mar 11 2022
Mar 9 2022
I'll +1 it to commit once they're moved to ieee80211_freebsd.c
Mar 2 2022
Feb 4 2022
Feb 3 2022
update ids
update id
update id
Feb 2 2022
address more things
address more things
address more things
Feb 1 2022
n/a
n/a
Fix debug
update dates
update dates
update dates
Update dates
Jan 30 2022
broke it up into three commits/reviews to make this easier
pull out the dts/include bits into a different commit in the stack
fix debug flags macro expansion
Jan 21 2022
What's left to land this?
Jan 13 2022
.. if you're distributing workload with RSS and you set the numebr of RSS netisr contexts, that's where you can run your parallelism. The whole point here is to whack all the net processing in netisr contexts rather than keeping adding taskqueues and inventing new/fun ways to map cpus and figure out how many.
Dec 28 2021
Dec 27 2021
commit msg
Dec 26 2021
remove old debugging
update from mmels' feedback:
Dec 25 2021
Dec 23 2021
Dec 19 2021
Dec 16 2021
Dec 14 2021
Dec 6 2021
Fix commit msg
Address some feedback!
Dec 5 2021
Updates from comments
going to update the patch in a sec with the above stuff updated
Dec 1 2021
Nov 30 2021
comment from manu
more updates from jrtc27
updates
Nov 27 2021
Nov 14 2021
I think it's fine. This only /really/ works with non-VLAN packets (ask me how I know due to MIPS, sigh) as the VLAN header ends up making the ethernet header size 2 bytes larger. It brings it inline with the rest of the system behaviour in this case.