- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
May 26 2016
In D6572#138990, @cem wrote:I don't dislike the if() { } cleanup pattern on exit, even if it is impossible with today's code.
Does this code ever get compiled in userspace? Do the mem_alloc routines do the same thing there?
Looks fine to me.
May 25 2016
Match existing {} style
Closed by commit rS300686: Fix a couple of Coverity Unintended sign extension sign extension (authored by truckman).
Closed by commit : rS300685: Fix a couple of new instances of a false positive Coverity buffer (authored by truckman).
Clear cdb_storage before reusing it.
May 24 2016
dup
Whitespace changes
Re-order the tests in the name sanitization loop to eliminate the else clause
Return early when possible to reduce code nesting.
I like the early return idea, though it will make the diff a lot bigger.
May 23 2016
In D6496#137886, @imp wrote:I like the code cleanup, but foo[1] is a time-honored technique to get the address following foo. I'm surprised this would be flagged as an error.
Any thoughts about MFC to 10-STABLE?
I just counted 'em up and found that this is responsible for 77 Coverity errors.