I am planning on committing 1 and 2 individually.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Oct 8 2020
Oct 6 2020
Sep 15 2020
In D26220#587460, @pnagato_protonmail.com wrote:
Sep 14 2020
Sep 12 2020
Might I suggest that you enable NetBSD's cp tests, and add necessary tests to prevent this breakage again?
Sep 11 2020
Sep 8 2020
minor update to include some new register definitions.. unused for now..
Sep 4 2020
don't overwrite the RCR register, keep some bits set. This gets
MTU up to 4096 - mumble working w/o my devices crashing...
Sep 2 2020
In D26220#584528, @pnagato_protonmail.com wrote:In D26220#584521, @imp wrote:In D26220#584195, @pnagato_protonmail.com wrote:I'm having trouble understanding its purpose. Maybe you could give a one or two sentence summary of what it should test?
@imp I am assuming the sbuf_new_negative_test is supposed to test for cases for which sbuf_new fails to create a sbuf.
From sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c
KASSERT(length >= 0, ("attempt to create an sbuf of negative length (%d)", length)); KASSERT((flags & ~SBUF_USRFLAGMSK) == 0, ("%s called with invalid flags", __func__));or when SBMALLOC fails..
Sep 1 2020
move some debug prints to before the error...
Aug 11 2020
Aug 10 2020
Thanks for committing this. I've run the patch for a while, and it solves my panic, and didn't introduce any others.
Jul 30 2020
commited in https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS363683
Jul 29 2020
In D25874#573062, @zeising wrote:Removed manual pages need to be added to ObsoleteFiles.inc as well.
didn't complain about missing file on command line, that being
rp's module dir..
forgot to remove from files..
too smart w/ command line, include the rest of the files..
Jul 27 2020
I'll wait to get a few more reports of tests before committing..
ok, these should address all of your comments.
update to address hselasky's comments.
make it relative to HEAD.. Post white space commit..
Jul 25 2020
Jul 24 2020
Jul 23 2020
I'm going to commit the change (which the grammar fix) in the next day or two if I don't get any more feedback.
Jul 17 2020
In D17541#569015, @freqlabs wrote:Yes a PR clarifying this in OpenZFS would be greatly appreciated. Any change here would only be good for MFC. I think the wording suggested by @delphij is a bit more clear.
@freqlabs let ms know if you just want to integrate this into the OpenZFS update, or what.
Looks fine. You should look at unrolling the loop to 3 or 4 rounds. Looking at the A72 optimization guide, it shows that there is a 3 cycle latency, but throughput of 1. Section 4.10 gives example showing three pairs to achieve max perf.
Jul 16 2020
Looks good to me. I'm adding ngie as they did the port to Python 3. I have not run and verified that this works under Python 3, but fully support the move to 3.
Jun 7 2020
In D21886#554614, @imp wrote:Cool script. It would be better to add the alias with devfs. Then it would disappear w/o devd needing all the info...
Jun 6 2020
I took Daniel O'Connor's script from: https://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-usb@freebsd.org/msg14258.html
May 24 2020
a later diff has addressed these comments.
these should not have been marked done. Why phab did this I have no clue. Maybe they think that if you update a patch you address all of your comments, but that is a TERRIBLE assumption to make.
update with comments from manu
add the path to the diff...
May 21 2020
If you want to test, you generate a self sign cert:
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:4096 -keyout key.pem -out cert.pem -days 365
In D24945#549225, @gordon wrote:In D24945#549197, @cem wrote:We should also disable SSL2, if we do not already. And perhaps TLS 1.0?
SSLv2 already doesn't exist, so no problem there.
TLSv1.0 is still widely deployed. I think removing support entirely is premature.
Tested and working.
May 20 2020
Sorry, got a bit excited that things worked.
This booted on my 07S board w/o me having to set hw.ncpu in loader!
May 19 2020
In D14429#548455, @skibo wrote:In D14429#548354, @jmg wrote:I just tested this on my Cora Z7-07S board, and it looks like there's a hardware bug that prevents this patch from working.
I added a printf to dump mp_maxid and mp_ncpus, and I get 1 and 2 respectively, which per the TRM indicates that it's suppose to have 2 cpus instead of 1.
Crud. I guess the number of CPUs isn't properly represented in the SCU config register. Do you know the value of the entire register? From the u-boot prompt,
type "md 0xf8f00004 1". Another idea is to key off the device field of the SLCR's PSS_IDCODE register at 0xf8000530. Can you get that value too?
It also shows up in a sysctl under "hw.zynq.pss_idcode".
I just tested this on my Cora Z7-07S board, and it looks like there's a hardware bug that prevents this patch from working.
May 17 2020
Thanks, I'll look at committing this. I have a Cora Z7 that needs this.
May 16 2020
Oct 23 2019
Is there a reason this hasn't been committed?
Oct 17 2019
In D22068#482123, @marcel wrote:Would you mind splitting the changes into 2 reviews/commits. I don't oppose the changes, but they are logically unrelated/independent and it helps us with reversals and/or MFCs if they are separate commits.
Oct 9 2019
Sep 16 2019
Aug 15 2019
Nov 25 2018
Yeah, after a bit of splunking after writing that comment, I discovered that it was unused.
Nov 24 2018
why was this removed? This was necessary to prevent lock inversion due to a kq being in another kq...
Nov 14 2018
Nov 5 2018
Oct 28 2018
oh, don't forget to bump date!
looks good! Thanks!
Oct 25 2018
Now that memset_s is part of the standard, should we just make explicit_bzero a wrapper for memset_s?
Oct 12 2018
Sep 16 2018
Sep 10 2018
For reference, on an active pf firewall, before the patch, ~1.56% cpu core was used on the purge thread, after the patch, .427% cpu core. over a third less CPU. This is with the same 128k hash table size.
Sep 9 2018
CPU usage calculated by taking the time pf purge ran and dividing it by the difference between now, and lstart:
ps -ax -o lstart,time,command | grep pf; date
Sun Sep 9 16:31:23 2018 0:30.95 [pf purge]
Sun Sep 9 19:33:53 2018 0:00.02 grep pf
Sun Sep 9 19:33:53 UTC 2018
note, if you apply the diff and check it w/ svn diff -x -wb, you'll see that the only change is the comment, the if, and the braces.
Sep 1 2018
All comments are minor.
Aug 29 2018
ok, this should be ready to land.. Not going to update printf(9),
that'll be a different patch, and there are missing vprintf and vlog
from the body of the man page...
Aug 28 2018
add fix for when printf returns an error, pass the error up
correctly.. prf_buf does not return an error..
All but the printf error is addressed, and the next patch will address this issue.
Fix most of the issues. I will address the cast to int w/ a KASSERT in another update.
Update and address various comments.
Aug 24 2018
simple fix, limit local_read_rate to be 0 or 1. Even more simple that the fix that was committed.
@delphij this is my comment copied over from https://reviews.freebsd.org/D16866?id=47165 that was unaddressed.
I'll update the patch shortly. Thanks for the review.
Aug 23 2018
This does add some tests that were missing. I can commit those and the MLINK for _putbuf separately if people would like. I'm also fine breaking out the sys/kern/subr_bus.c changes as well.
Update. Use a new created printf drain function that works in both
userland and kernel. Document the function, and add tests for it.
Please commit these patches separately. They deal w/ different issues.
IMO, looks good to me.