Is the ports drm graphics drivers intended to be switched over to this framework, or is it only for ARM kernel drivers?

Perhaps @bcr can have a quick look at the man page?

In D22210#486191, @mat wrote:

In D22210#485892, @zeising wrote:

In D22210#485882, @mat wrote:

It would be much simpler to just add xorg to USES instead of sharing private variables everywhere.

Yes, however, that requires walking through the entire ports tree, which is a huge task.

Well, no, just add USES+=xorg in the .mk files.

In D22210#485882, @mat wrote:

It would be much simpler to just add xorg to USES instead of sharing private variables everywhere.

Thanks for adding the links, I forgot about it when creating the diff.
It is still pending an exp-run (just to be sure).

LGTM
Is cr.yp.to available using https? If so, update the links to use that. Otherwise it should be good to go.
Side note, what happened to qmail.org?

Ping @hselasky @imp @johalun

In D21974#480339, @antoine wrote:

• Please wait 3 or 4 days after actual EoL before removing 11.2 support (some builds will still be in flight)
• Having 11.2 hardcoded in portname and package name was a bad idea ; renaming it to 11.3 is an even worse idea, especially in a quarterly branch that is supposed to be stable (pkg upgrade will not work)