- User Since
- May 9 2014, 10:23 AM (245 w, 1 d)
Wed, Jan 16
Mon, Jan 14
ping this ?
Fri, Jan 11
Rebase, add SC2223, remove SC2086 (to be done last).
Wed, Jan 9
Switching LLVM's Python should probably be discussed with LLVM's maintainer, and not here. It has nothing to do with switching the default version of Python.
Tue, Jan 8
Mon, Jan 7
Sun, Jan 6
Sat, Jan 5
I wonder if the .if FLAVOR should not be changed to checks on PYTHON_VER, so that people who change the default Python version get the correct behavior.
Fri, Jan 4
Fri, Dec 28
Thu, Dec 27
If it is only the build being fixed, why bump PORTREVISION?
Why do you remove all the Created by lines, were those removal requested?
Wed, Dec 26
Tue, Dec 25
Mon, Dec 24
Looks ok now. Do tell me that the USES will be used by more than three ports.
Fri, Dec 21
Dec 21 2018
Dec 20 2018
Maybe it is my english not being correct, but I thought "I would rather" meant something that would be nice but not required.
Dec 19 2018
Dec 18 2018
Dec 17 2018
If having an invalid value in LICENSE_FILE does not make your test builds fails, you may have DISABLE_LICENSES set somewhere.
Well, you should not use Phabricator as a place to dump the patches you are working on, use git and branches or something.
Dec 16 2018
Dec 14 2018
Dec 13 2018
Dec 12 2018
Does this pass rclint?
- fixup! Options must use uppercase/digits.
Mmmm, ok, but outside of BROKEN_SSL being wrongly put there, do you have examples of ports that build with OpenSSL 1.1.1 from base but not from the port?
I'd rather you kept PORTDOCS, and the whole tree gets converted at once.
Dec 11 2018
Dec 10 2018
You are trying to coerce flavors into doing subpackages, so it is going to be a no on flavors. You could make it an option, or a slave port.
Dec 9 2018
Looks ok, make sure it all builds, and does not break INDEX before committing ;-)