I think it's time to create download-archive.FreeBSD.org and config https. Please hold on before this has been configured.

Change to full URL

Suppressed by D39417

Comment from @hrs: how about just using ESP partition?

Fix typo

Use the original target text if no link text specified, not the @-stripped one used in the link.

In D39067#891624, @lwhsu wrote:

source                                     link in html        target                                               status
package:devel/git@tiny[]               ->  devel/git       ->  https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/devel/git/       Link exists

Thanks, that was an unintentional typo when submitting the patch. The correct behavior should be:

Fix typo

In D37949#889489, @diizzy wrote:

Porters Handbook suggests that we use release archives whenever possible and these will indirectly have a backup as distcache will (I suppose) pick it up. It's not like we'll have any more using GitHub in that regard and it'll be most likely even harder to find a mirror if needed compared to release archives.

In D37949#862280, @diizzy wrote:

Any reason not to use upstreams release archives?
https://download.fcitx-im.org/fcitx5/xcb-imdkit/

I'm not really on vbox@ but I think this fix is suitable for blanket approval.

In D38815#884335, @imp wrote:

Can I share this with some folks that have expressed an interest in all things CI?

In D34739#883913, @mandree wrote:

@vishwin remove me again from reviewers and that will have grave consequences.

Does using firstboot_ci guarantee it is the *last* thing in booting?

I'm fine with this. For the record, when I worked on this, I kept azure.vhdf as it is an intermediate product and for aligning with other images. Note that the azure-do-upload target in Makefile.azure will upload as .vhd suffix, with more clear naming.

Covered by dad64f0e7cadb5913d6463fc014f59f8706d316c.

In D38496#877177, @des wrote:

In D38496#876169, @lwhsu wrote:

I also have some WIP tests for wc(1) to be added in D35877

It's unfortunate that this wasn't approved back in the day. Does it cover anything that my tests don't?

Don't forget to remove ccls entry in MOVED file.

lang/julia has been readded.

Close as committed.

I also have some WIP tests for wc(1) to be added in D35877

How do the package systems in other operating systems deal with Python bytecode?

Committed as rGa1f8a0c793c67ab5854035e017f34d3d016b6d0d

In D38074#865004, @diizzy wrote:

Is it worth keeping GTK2 around? It's EOL and we want to remove it at some point... (some point being years ago)