rf

rf

rf

chunked encoding again

add missing lower bound check on ndots

fix chunk decoding

Here's a preview of the conversion: https://git.des.dev/des/dpv

fix http

void

In D55424#1328149, @asiciliano wrote:

Again, if I ultimately cannot provide the required compatibility, I am completely fine with removing bsddialog and re-enabling the original LGPL dialog in BASE.

In D55424#1328131, @dteske wrote:

In D55424#1328125, @des wrote:

Do you prefer GitHub or Codeberg, and what is your login there? Or would you prefer to host the repository yourself somewhere else?

Let's go with GitHub -- my login is freebsdfrau there.

Do you prefer GitHub or Codeberg, and what is your login there? Or would you prefer to host the repository yourself somewhere else?

In D55424#1328036, @dteske wrote:

How does one construct a port to install software that has no home? Does that fall on me to rip it out an old base and port it to GitHub without the benefit of the FreeBSD build infrastructure?

In D55424#1328007, @dteske wrote:

I have not evaluated the ability of bsddialog to fill that possibility. However, if the maintainer of bsddialog is OK with me adding missing functionality to bridge that gap when we get to it, then I am fine moving dpv to ports.

In D55424#1327980, @dteske wrote:

Does bsddialog have an interface that is similar to dpv?

There's no need for a clang-only solution, you can handle enums just fine with only regular expressions as long as the names are sufficiently distinctive.

In D55424#1327941, @dteske wrote:

In D55424#1327936, @des wrote:

To what end?

1. bsdinstall for dist-based installations
2. bsdconfig packages
3. for utilization by humans that use the operating system

In D55424#1327922, @dteske wrote:

I obviously do not want to see dpv, libdpv, and libfigpar removed from base. I would like to update them.

rebase

rebase

@dteske have you given this any further thought?

tweak

tweak