In D50292#1147383, @zlei wrote:

RIP has been obsolete for over 20 years and no one is running it on modern networks

RIP is quite a simple routing protocol to be implemented, and can be found from lots of routers. It is still available from modern routers, even modern networks prefer other routing protocols.

I'd say RIP can be easily deployed rather than obsolete.

Initial tests on my Framework using rtwn(4), passed. Now running it on my HP 840 G5 with iwm(4) and Acer 4752 with iwn(4).

In D50050#1141447, @roy_marples.name wrote:

In D50050#1141446, @bz wrote:

In D50050#1141439, @zarychtam_plan-b.pwste.edu.pl wrote:

Since it was code in contrib, I didn't want to change it much; I just used a simple duct-tape fix. Indeed, PF_LOCAL works fine here as well, and it's likely the right fix.

Does it work on NetBSD? Otherwise we'll have merge conflicts with upstream or need to #ifdef this out.

Works fine. Ship it.

In D50050#1141351, @philip wrote:

I haven't tested this but assuming we do indeed use only interface ioctls, this looks like it should work.

LGTM following bz@'s suggestion.

LGTM

In D49418#1133225, @cy wrote:

LGTM

Do you want to add this patch to the ports or should I?

Do you want to add this patch to the ports or should I?