I see no problem with this. What do others think?

Tested by fluffy@ to work with poudriere.

In D58286#1339612, @cy wrote:

bsd.incs.mk absolutely requires INCLUDEDIR.

bsd.incs.mk absolutely requires INCLUDEDIR.

This update installs profile.h from krb5/include along with other
header files. This also avoids the issue of bsd.incs.mk not
installing the header file when INTERNALLIB is defined.

In D58286#1337791, @des wrote:

A simple .include <bsd.incs.mk> at the bottom should suffice.

Add pkgbase support.

In D53978#1336329, @cracauer wrote:

A benchmark that is easy to reproduce for everybody:

cd /usr/src/sys && find . -name \*.[ch] | ctime xargs grep -i -n preempt_thresh

no -i old code:
0:00.61 0.61 real 0.48 user 0.10 sys 95% CPU 0/1114 faults
old code -i:
0:24.59 24.59 real 24.44 user 0.11 sys 99% CPU 0/1047 faults
patch -i:
0:00.65 0.65 real 0.53 user 0.09 sys 95% CPU 0/1091 faults
patch no -i:
0:00.64 0.64 real 0.55 user 0.05 sys 95% CPU 0/1081 faults

/usr/include is the standard location for profile.h. See below on a Red Hat server.

Properly address the problem during installworld.

Remove OptionalObsoleteFiles designation.

In D56835#1311163, @michaelo wrote:

There is one thing I'd really love to see what RC does not have at all: user units like systemd has. It often happens that our users want to run something in the background and I cannot offer anything, but to create an RC for them, install doas, delegate, etc. Too complex. For k5start on AL8 for a specific user I have created a user unit and it does what it should do: keep the Kerberos ticket cache alive. I'd love to hear your opinion on it.