Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

tcp: bump max snd buffer size for autoscaling
ClosedPublic

Authored by tuexen on Oct 2 2025, 7:30 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F159857879: D52872.diff
Thu, Jun 18, 8:56 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jun 16, 9:26 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Jun 15, 10:15 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Jun 15, 2:55 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jun 14, 2:28 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jun 9, 7:56 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jun 9, 4:05 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Jun 8, 10:19 AM
Subscribers

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

tuexen requested review of this revision.Oct 2 2025, 7:30 PM
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 2 2025, 7:39 PM
tuexen retitled this revision from tcp: bump max rcv buffer size for autoscaling to tcp: bump max snd buffer size for autoscaling.Oct 2 2025, 7:57 PM
jtl added a subscriber: jtl.

Is this worthy of a release note?

In D52872#1207881, @jtl wrote:

Is this worthy of a release note?

Yes, the combination of D52871, D52872, and D52873.

In D52872#1207881, @jtl wrote:

Is this worthy of a release note?

Yes, the combination of D52871, D52872, and D52873.

Why not combine all three into one commit/review? IMO, the concerns are roughly the same with all three. (And, to repeat what I've said elsewhere: "My main concern about these three revisions is that they are somewhat susceptible of remote manipulation, and that could make it easier to DoS a server. However, I view that as a tradeoff that the user needs to make, and think an appropriate release note should suffice to warn about these issues."

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.