Sorry for the late reply... no major complaints. For the future, remember that "may" usually implies permission ("yes, you may overwrite that file now"), while "might" is usually better to use to say that something might or might not happen: "this function might return a pointer to a random area of memory". Also, try to avoid "the former" or "the latter", because it forces the reader to stop and look back to see which is which.

This diff has no context, so it is difficult to review. Please update the diff with full context as shown in https://wiki.freebsd.org/action/show/Phabricator?action=show&redirect=CodeReview#Create_a_Revision_via_Web_Interface

This diff has no context, so it is difficult to review. Please update the diff with full context as shown in https://wiki.freebsd.org/action/show/Phabricator?action=show&redirect=CodeReview#Create_a_Revision_via_Web_Interface

In D8362#175166, @mat wrote:

There are more than one commit, the whitespace fixes will go in separate commits.

Some of these are whitespace-only changes. I don't know how many groups have translated this document, though.

I think this is a good idea. To go a step further, would it be more useful to have the tables in major revision descending order? FreeBSD 12 first, then 11, 10, and so on. As it is, most readers will usually have to scroll to near the end.

Looks good to me.

The sheer quantity of this work is amazing. Thank you!

Wow, the rendered version is not only shorter but easier to read. Thank you!

Thank you!

Thank you!

Man page looks good, but please test with mandoc -Tlint and igor -Rbefore commit. Thanks!

In D7612#171511, @avg wrote:

@wblock I remember making them and updating the diff.
I look at this https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7612?vs=21017&id=21295&whitespace=ignore-most#toc and I see the changes.

In D7612#171485, @avg wrote:

In D7612#171482, @wblock wrote:

In D7612#170785, @avg wrote:

@wblock thank you!

You're welcome, but none of them seem to have changed the source.

Apologies, I failed to understand this comment... could you please explain?

In D7612#170785, @avg wrote:

@wblock thank you!

Please do the standard mandoc -Tlint and igor -R tests, but looks good to me. Thanks!

Thank you for doing this!

I'm sorry for the delay on this, but have found no better way to address these problems. I suggest that we commit this as better than what was there previously.

No problem, looks good to me too.

Remember to bump .Dd on loader.8.

Man page looks okay to me. Thank you!

In D8012#168259, @hselasky wrote:

@wblock
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306634

Man page changes look okay. Given the choice, I'd change all of them from "will be" to "are", but that's out of the scope of this change.

This is fine. Would you like to fix the sentence that leads up to it while we are here?

Updated for feedback.

Remember to bump .Dd in the four man pages. Thanks!

Works for me. Please run mandoc -Tlint and igor -R on it to check for unexpected problems before commit.

Thank you!

Very nice! My only suggestions are:

Thank you!

I find this cromulent.

Krelbf the snootlax!

One last thing...