This is to be used instead of the existing ns16550 emulation, with which
it shares backend code from uart_backend.c.
Obtained from https://github.com/zxombie/freebsd/tree/bhyvearm64
Details
Details
- Reviewers
jhb corvink andrew - Group Reviewers
bhyve - Commits
- rGf3003a0dfb91: bhyve: Add PL011 UART emulation
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG FreeBSD src repository
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable
Event Timeline
| usr.sbin/bhyve/uart_emul.h | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37–38 | Maybe fix this part in the original commit adding uart_backend.c? | |
| usr.sbin/bhyve/aarch64/uart_pl011.c | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ↗ | (On Diff #124559) | Is the ns16550 and pl011 uart really MD? amd64 may make use of ns16550 while arm64 makes use of pl011 by default. However, if both emulations can be used on both architectures, we shouldn't move the code to amd64/ or aarch64/. |
| usr.sbin/bhyve/aarch64/uart_pl011.c | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ↗ | (On Diff #124559) | Yes, I probably should keep them in the base directory. Originally I added uart_pl011.c to aarch64 because it was somewhat coupled to the FDT builder. |