python3 support

In D29917#711373, @pstef wrote:

How do I obtain befs.img.bz2? I can see it neither in tree nor in this patch.

BeFS detection support for fstyp

Naming convention applied

Naming convention applied

naming convention and clean up code

naming convention and clean up code

In D29917#672536, @pfg wrote:

In D29917#672452, @danfe wrote:

@miguel_gocobachi.dev wrote:

Thank you. I will go for the name BeFS because I noticed other things using this name

Yes please. BFS is way too generic and we had experienced name clashes in the past because they were too short. Even better if it could be done consistently, i.e. applied to macros like BFS_OS_NAME_LENGTH and BFS_SUPER_BLOCK_MAGIC1.

No. those are documented in Practical File System Design with the Be File System, and we should match their definition. Section 4.8 recommends B_OS_NAME_LENGTH, Alternatively we could use the Haiku definitions.

BTW, it would be nice if we could use other fields from the superblock, but I have no time to investigate whatever other fstype filesystems use.

In D29917#672220, @pfg wrote:

We don't have the naming conflict here, but befs is OK.
FWIW, there is a fuse version which would be useful before considering a kernel version.

changed the name to befs following the linux implementation

style(9) applied and bfs test image fixed

0mp review changes

I am debating of using the name "bfs" or "befs", the Linux kernel has two filesystems with those names, and the second one is used for the BeOS filesystem, which is this case.

In D25742#574817, @lwhsu wrote:

In D25742#574814, @miguel_gocobachi.dev wrote:

Last commit was Jun 30 of this year https://github.com/kakserpom/phpdaemon/commit/9362e586d21343de7fb511f6b3cbfc5ae13a4364

Indeed, sorry that I always got confused by github's new interface. From the commit log, there seems to have lots of fixes after the 1.0-beta release. Would it be a better choice to use a snapshot instead of using a beta release from 4 years ago?

In D25742#574813, @lwhsu wrote:

In D25742#571172, @miguel_gocobachi.dev wrote:

I think I got all the comments covered.

Yeah, all the files look good now and build is fine. I am somehow a bit hesitated to add this because I'm curious if there is any party using this, or there is any software depends on this. The upstream development seems stopped for 4 years. I am happy to add this port even the possible user is very few, but I want to know more about the potential users of this port first.

In D25569#573948, @0mp wrote:

Hmm, it looks like make test is failing (at least when I test it in poudriere).

Have you experienced that? This is the relevant part from the logs of make test:

cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/deskutils/bookworm/work/bookworm-1.1.2/build && ninja test                                                                                                                           [135/5179]
[0/1] Running all tests.
1/2 Validate desktop file OK             0.01s
2/2 Validate appdata file FAIL           13.55s (exit status 1)

Ok:                 1
Expected Fail:      0
Fail:               1
Unexpected Pass:    0
Skipped:            0
Timeout:            0


The output from the failed tests:

2/2 Validate appdata file FAIL           13.55s (exit status 1)

--- command ---
20:18:52 /usr/local/bin/appstream-util validate /wrkdirs/usr/ports/deskutils/bookworm/work/bookworm-1.1.2/build/data/com.github.babluboy.bookworm.appdata.xml
--- stdout ---
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/deskutils/bookworm/work/bookworm-1.1.2/build/data/com.github.babluboy.bookworm.appdata.xml: FAILED:
? tag-missing           : <translation> not specified
? tag-invalid           : <release> version was duplicated
? attribute-invalid     : <screenshot> height too large [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babluboy/bookworm/gh-pages/images/BookwormLibraryView.png] maximum is 900px
? style-invalid         : <image> has vertical padding [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babluboy/bookworm/gh-pages/images/BookwormLibraryView.png]
? style-invalid         : <image> has horizontal padding [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babluboy/bookworm/gh-pages/images/BookwormLibraryView.png]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Right to Left Reading]
? style-invalid         : <li> cannot end in '.' [Use of GResource to speed up loading of icons, scripts, etc.]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Annotations and two page views]
? style-invalid         : <p> is too short [Annotations and two page views]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Support for MOBI format and UX improvements]
? style-invalid         : <p> is too short [Support for MOBI format and UX improvements]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [UX improvements for list view and other preference customizations]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Comics support and UX improvements]
? style-invalid         : <p> is too short [Comics support and UX improvements]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [PDF support and UX improvements]
? style-invalid         : <p> is too short [PDF support and UX improvements]
? style-invalid         : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Initial release with support for EPUB format]
? style-invalid         : <p> is too short [Initial release with support for EPUB format]
? tag-invalid           : <release> versions are not in order [1.0.0 before 1.1.0]
--- stderr ---
Validation of files failed
-------

thanks guys, I though @wulf was the maintainer as well. But thank you very much for following this up all of you.

I think I got all the comments covered.

Suggestion applied following @mat, @lbartoletti, @zeising

@lwhsu this is ready to be merged.

@wulf or @lwhsu can you merge this into the ports tree? thanks!

In D25742#569683, @zeising wrote:

Can you also include the patch for www/Makefile?

zeising PR suggestions applied

0.0.3 version bumped

applied 0mp suggestions

applied wulf recomendations

understood, thanks!

Updates following the reviews suggestions:

I think I found the solution for this one.