In D25569#729852, @0mp wrote:Would you like to become the maintainer of this port, @miguel_gocobachi.dev? You've done all the heavy lifting here!
Also, the port is ready to land. I'll commit it once you give me green light.
- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Feed Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Advanced Search
Oct 14 2021
Oct 14 2021
miguel_gocobachi.dev added a comment to D25569: [NEW] deskutils/bookworm: Simple, focused ebook reader.
Aug 17 2021
Aug 17 2021
miguel_gocobachi.dev updated the diff for D25569: [NEW] deskutils/bookworm: Simple, focused ebook reader.
python3 support
In D29917#711373, @pstef wrote:How do I obtain befs.img.bz2? I can see it neither in tree nor in this patch.
Aug 16 2021
Aug 16 2021
miguel_gocobachi.dev updated the diff for D25569: [NEW] deskutils/bookworm: Simple, focused ebook reader.
Aug 15 2021
Aug 15 2021
Apr 28 2021
Apr 28 2021
BeFS detection support for fstyp
Naming convention applied
Naming convention applied
Apr 26 2021
Apr 26 2021
naming convention and clean up code
naming convention and clean up code
Apr 25 2021
Apr 25 2021
In D29917#672536, @pfg wrote:In D29917#672452, @danfe wrote:@miguel_gocobachi.dev wrote:Thank you. I will go for the name BeFS because I noticed other things using this name
Yes please. BFS is way too generic and we had experienced name clashes in the past because they were too short. Even better if it could be done consistently, i.e. applied to macros like BFS_OS_NAME_LENGTH and BFS_SUPER_BLOCK_MAGIC1.
No. those are documented in Practical File System Design with the Be File System, and we should match their definition. Section 4.8 recommends B_OS_NAME_LENGTH, Alternatively we could use the Haiku definitions.
BTW, it would be nice if we could use other fields from the superblock, but I have no time to investigate whatever other fstype filesystems use.
Apr 24 2021
Apr 24 2021
In D29917#672220, @pfg wrote:We don't have the naming conflict here, but befs is OK.
FWIW, there is a fuse version which would be useful before considering a kernel version.
miguel_gocobachi.dev retitled D29917: BeFS support for fstyp command from BFS support for fstyp command to BeFS support for fstyp command.
changed the name to befs following the linux implementation
style(9) applied and bfs test image fixed
Apr 23 2021
Apr 23 2021
Apr 22 2021
Apr 22 2021
0mp review changes
I am debating of using the name "bfs" or "befs", the Linux kernel has two filesystems with those names, and the second one is used for the BeOS filesystem, which is this case.
miguel_gocobachi.dev added reviewers for D29917: BeFS support for fstyp command: cse_cem_gmail_com, trasz, mmacy, lwhsu, pfg.
Aug 4 2020
Aug 4 2020
In D25742#574817, @lwhsu wrote:In D25742#574814, @miguel_gocobachi.dev wrote:Last commit was Jun 30 of this year https://github.com/kakserpom/phpdaemon/commit/9362e586d21343de7fb511f6b3cbfc5ae13a4364
Indeed, sorry that I always got confused by github's new interface. From the commit log, there seems to have lots of fixes after the 1.0-beta release. Would it be a better choice to use a snapshot instead of using a beta release from 4 years ago?
In D25742#574813, @lwhsu wrote:In D25742#571172, @miguel_gocobachi.dev wrote:I think I got all the comments covered.
Yeah, all the files look good now and build is fine. I am somehow a bit hesitated to add this because I'm curious if there is any party using this, or there is any software depends on this. The upstream development seems stopped for 4 years. I am happy to add this port even the possible user is very few, but I want to know more about the potential users of this port first.
Jul 31 2020
Jul 31 2020
miguel_gocobachi.dev added a comment to D25569: [NEW] deskutils/bookworm: Simple, focused ebook reader.
In D25569#573948, @0mp wrote:Hmm, it looks like make test is failing (at least when I test it in poudriere).
Have you experienced that? This is the relevant part from the logs of make test:
cd /wrkdirs/usr/ports/deskutils/bookworm/work/bookworm-1.1.2/build && ninja test [135/5179] [0/1] Running all tests. 1/2 Validate desktop file OK 0.01s 2/2 Validate appdata file FAIL 13.55s (exit status 1) Ok: 1 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 1 Unexpected Pass: 0 Skipped: 0 Timeout: 0 The output from the failed tests: 2/2 Validate appdata file FAIL 13.55s (exit status 1) --- command --- 20:18:52 /usr/local/bin/appstream-util validate /wrkdirs/usr/ports/deskutils/bookworm/work/bookworm-1.1.2/build/data/com.github.babluboy.bookworm.appdata.xml --- stdout --- /wrkdirs/usr/ports/deskutils/bookworm/work/bookworm-1.1.2/build/data/com.github.babluboy.bookworm.appdata.xml: FAILED: ? tag-missing : <translation> not specified ? tag-invalid : <release> version was duplicated ? attribute-invalid : <screenshot> height too large [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babluboy/bookworm/gh-pages/images/BookwormLibraryView.png] maximum is 900px ? style-invalid : <image> has vertical padding [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babluboy/bookworm/gh-pages/images/BookwormLibraryView.png] ? style-invalid : <image> has horizontal padding [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/babluboy/bookworm/gh-pages/images/BookwormLibraryView.png] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Right to Left Reading] ? style-invalid : <li> cannot end in '.' [Use of GResource to speed up loading of icons, scripts, etc.] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Annotations and two page views] ? style-invalid : <p> is too short [Annotations and two page views] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Support for MOBI format and UX improvements] ? style-invalid : <p> is too short [Support for MOBI format and UX improvements] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [UX improvements for list view and other preference customizations] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Comics support and UX improvements] ? style-invalid : <p> is too short [Comics support and UX improvements] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [PDF support and UX improvements] ? style-invalid : <p> is too short [PDF support and UX improvements] ? style-invalid : <p> does not end in '.|:|!' [Initial release with support for EPUB format] ? style-invalid : <p> is too short [Initial release with support for EPUB format] ? tag-invalid : <release> versions are not in order [1.0.0 before 1.1.0] --- stderr --- Validation of files failed -------
Jul 24 2020
Jul 24 2020
thanks guys, I though @wulf was the maintainer as well. But thank you very much for following this up all of you.
I think I got all the comments covered.
Suggestion applied following @mat, @lbartoletti, @zeising
Jul 23 2020
Jul 23 2020
Jul 22 2020
Jul 22 2020
@lwhsu this is ready to be merged.
Jul 20 2020
Jul 20 2020
In D25742#569683, @zeising wrote:Can you also include the patch for www/Makefile?
zeising PR suggestions applied
Jul 6 2020
Jul 6 2020
0.0.3 version bumped
miguel_gocobachi.dev requested review of D25569: [NEW] deskutils/bookworm: Simple, focused ebook reader.
Jul 3 2020
Jul 3 2020
applied 0mp suggestions
applied wulf recomendations
Jul 1 2020
Jul 1 2020
understood, thanks!
Updates following the reviews suggestions:
I think I found the solution for this one.
Jun 30 2020
Jun 30 2020
Jun 29 2020
Jun 29 2020