Address @markj 's and @kib 's comments

In D57624#1336128, @markj wrote:

Did you microbenchmark the new implementation? I'd be curious to know, say, how many cycles it takes to execute 10000 back-to-back 4KB page invalidations using the old and new implementations respectively, when the target CPU mask is just the current CPU and when it's the set of all CPUs.

In D54641#1344263, @jhb wrote:

When a new PCI device shows up in hotplug both for native PCI-e hotplug and other systems like the ACPI approach you are using, the new device just shows up with all decoding disabled and the BARs set to their reset values (address of 0). It is the guest OS's job to allocate address space for the BARs and manage the address space.

LGTM, but I'd wait for at least one member of manpages to take a look.

In D57741#1339463, @thebugfixers_pm.me wrote:

Anyway, coming quickly back to your actual question I guess I must have thought at the time that touching cat might also eventually land me unwelcome attention for daring to touch a long-standing binary if they came looking for me on other diffs, so it was quite possibly a pre-emptive abandoning.

@emaste are there any other blockers here other than your comment? The fix is quite straightforward and I see no reason not to land this.

Why was this review closed? The issue wasn't resolved in the meantime and I see no reason not to land this.

Address @glebius 's comments

In D58305#1337458, @pouria wrote:

@bnovkov Should I wait for you to test, or are we good to land this?

Address @glebius 's comments

Add missing const qualifiers

Address @mmel 's and @mhorne 's comments.

In D58306#1337245, @bz wrote:

Please see the wireless mailing list where I sent a patch for test and did not get feedback. Changing the driver is the wrong thing to do (not that it works well currently).

https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless/2026-July/004328.html

Account for EINPROGRESS

In D58281#1337131, @glebius wrote:

In D58281#1337102, @bnovkov wrote:

Thank you for the offer, but I was trying to avoid unnecessary churn if the same thing can be achieved with ifa_ifwithnet. If you have future uses for a fib-aware version of ifa_ifwithaddr() I can implement it as well.

There will be less churn if you use standard KPI in the right place instead of current version. Pouria also needs this function. Even if he didn't, still creating this KPI on the first need is the right thing to do.

In D58281#1337090, @pouria wrote:

In D58281#1336902, @bnovkov wrote:

In D58281#1336697, @glebius wrote:

Instead of calling fib4_lookup() that has a different purpose, we need ifa_ifwithaddr() version that has fibnum argument.

Looking through net/if.c I noticed that ifa_ifwithnet seems to match what you're suggesting here, do you think we can use this function instead of adding a fibnum-aware version of `ifa_ifwithaddr()`?

I'll create a fib-aware version of ifa_ifwithaddr() and will let you know.

In D58281#1336697, @glebius wrote:

Instead of calling fib4_lookup() that has a different purpose, we need ifa_ifwithaddr() version that has fibnum argument.

Looking through net/if.c I noticed that ifa_ifwithnet seems to match what you're suggesting here, do you think we can use this function instead of adding a fibnum-aware version of `ifa_ifwithaddr()`?

In D57692#1335508, @ziaee wrote:

Thanks for helping with it. Can I land it instead? This is part of GCE C4A turnup.

Avoid clearing CPU mask for range invalidation

Address @markj 's comments

In D57623#1325383, @mhorne wrote:

Is this implemented on the Spacemit K1 ?

Rename 'vms' to 'vmm'

LGTM, I'll split this up into two separate commits and land it tomorrow if there are no additional objections by then.

In D57887#1333560, @slw_zxy.spb.ru wrote:

The patch is updated to match all your last comments. What needs to be done from my side to get it pushed to main?

Two broader points:

• Please check for missing license headers and convert the existing ones to the shorter form listed in style(9)
• sys/sys/kernel.h has a bunch of unnecessary changes

LGTM, provided that @kib has no complaints.

I have no further suggestions or complaints after this one, I think we can land this after it's addressed, provided there are no complaints from anyone else.

Address @markj 's and @mhorne 's comments:

• add an svinval-aware pmap_invalidate_page variant
• remove awkward atop conversion

Two more nits, looks good otherwise.

One more thing, could you please document this feature in bhyve's manpage?

Address @markj's comments

In D51635#1315903, @ae wrote:

I think this commit breaks the case, when cursor is not yet set:

R_NEXT  Retrieve the key/data pair immediately after the cursor.
        If the cursor is not yet set, this is the same as the
        R_FIRST flag.

at least we found that now it is required to pass R_FIRST in the read loop:

+       flags = R_FIRST;
-       while ((ret = dbh->seq(dbh, &keycol, &valuecol, R_NEXT)) == 0) {
+       while ((ret = dbh->seq(dbh, &keycol, &valuecol, flags)) == 0) {
+               if (flags == R_FIRST)
+                       flags = R_NEXT;

otherwise the application didn't see any entries in db file.