I tried to capture the sense of the specification, rather than specific (Linux/systemd) usage. Please double check it.

LGTM

Update article tags.

Shall I move ahead with this set of changes? If anyone wants me to wait on their review, please say so.

In D56430#1292513, @carlavilla wrote:

In D56430#1292349, @ziaee wrote:

I don't really understand how the .po files work, @ebrandi usually regenerates them all at once every few months.

The .po files are generated using po4a (https://www.po4a.org/), and then they load all of them to the weblate instance.
And when the translation is finished, they convert the .po files into .adoc using also po4a

Thanks again. When I have the chance I will test this and merge the change (likely early next week).

Thanks for digging into this.

Looks good, with one required change.

VERY GOOD!

I know the "Copyright before SPDX" issue was discussed and decided (maybe ad nauseam). I admit I still have little understanding of why, but I note that much more will need to be done to make it known. New code being committed to the src tree still has the SPDX first, as this is the nearly universal precedent.
So, just saying, you who are interested will need to advertise this decision more widely.

Please also add an entry to the share/man/man9/cdefs.9 man page.

Based on the original submission it is not a typo (D48877). It took one year for the merge to happen. I suggest just to leave it as is.

Cool! A couple initial things.

In D45961#1292026, @carlavilla wrote:

If you move this to an article.
Please after putting it in production, remember to ask clusteradm@ to create a redirect in nginx

Rebase on top of content changes: D45962 and D45963.

Rebase.

Rebase.

Rebase. Handle moving the new Russian translation.

In D56429#1291890, @adrian wrote:

Looks good; do we have a manpage with the other OF_ methods?

@ali_mashtizadeh.com is it likely to be used in the near future?

In D56171#1285819, @cracauer wrote:

It's worse. copystr and strlcpy also have a different
idea of what string length means. Taken into account now.

I'm sorry this got forgotten. I think this is ready, so I'm going to merge it now so that it doesn't get dropped again.

Hi, thanks for taking this on, it would be nice to see this conversion completed.

Seems like a few have already spoken. Thanks for being attentive here.

The IGNORE seems like a fine solution for now, and can be changed to fit how these macros actually get used. I suspect the active/legacy release lists will still require frequent micro-management. (this is now your purview? ;) )

Thanks for working on these macros. I think in many places they are highly desirable.

Not an authority on shells and their lineage, but I certainly agree with your assessment in the description.