User Details
- User Since
- May 14 2014, 7:57 AM (614 w, 4 d)
Today
Yesterday
ok, this one boots fine in p8 pseries and p9 pseries, but p8 powernv it .. just hangs during boot and eventually ends up at OPAL.
Wed, Feb 18
oh interesting. is this different from straight -head? If it is then i need to fix it. If it isn't then it's expected behaviour!
refactor
refactor
refactor
refactor
Tue, Feb 17
Mon, Feb 16
migrate this to /just/ do rwlock migration, not the iteration stuff.
Hm, this is an interesting problem/question.
Sun, Feb 15
oh this is a good catch!
looks good plz land
compile tested
rw_init_flags() -> rw_init()
Sat, Feb 14
nope, still no dice
ok, lemme try this latest one in qemu real quick, hold.
Just tried the latest diff on power9/pseries qemu, it panics differently now
Fri, Feb 13
ok i thought this was OK on power9 but it seems not:
ok, tried with 8g in the VM instead of 2g, same issue.
and from justin on irc
This boots fine in qemu-system-ppc64 pseries9 + power9, but in qemu-system-ppc64 pseries-8.0 + power8, it immediately panics on boot with
Wed, Feb 11
Tue, Feb 10
Mon, Feb 9
I think it's fine to land as-is. Yes, the vlog vs vprintf discussion should happen soon. :-)
Sun, Feb 8
oh crap i missed testing this; lemme test this on -HEAD today on the G5 and POWER8.
As mentioned on IRC, I think we should create _PATH_DEBUG_PREFIX or something similar to hide the /usr/lib/debug path.
- convert the superpage lock path to use the iterator lock
- and another function involved as well
delete old code
Sat, Feb 7
updated; i removed the recursive lock as now we shouldn't be recursing.
update
Fri, Feb 6
not needed now!
Thu, Feb 5
I did, I tried searching for 'pkg search git-arc' ;-P
looks good, land when you're ready!
Wed, Feb 4
@jhb so the submitter is going to also need to add/bump symbol versions to a bunch of stdio routines? Is that what you're saying?
This looks fine to me, nice catch!
I think this is fine; let's see what justin thinks tomorrow morning!
oh that's a good catch!
Also /proc/iomem, which i think has what you're after in more specific detail:
here's petitboot:
ok, two normal boots and then the boot with this diff attached are at https://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/powerpc64/20260203-D54745-fail-1.txt .
so it didn't finish booting;
ok, its definitely unhappy, stay tuned!
Tue, Feb 3
rebase after jhibbits@ recent changes
