• allwinner -> Arm
• Attach the Makefile to std.arm

The best names I can come up with for a workaround for a missing feature is feat_foo_missing or feat_foo_workaround

Can you try D52930 and D52931?

In D52744#1205716, @alc wrote:

In D52744#1205060, @andrew wrote:

Note that the llsc instructions have some subtly when implementing fully sequentially consistent semantics. As the acquire and release are on different instructions this means memory operations may move into the sequence & be swapped. As we don't implement them in atomic(9) this shouldn't be an issue, however will be if we latter add them.

I vaguely recall Linux having an issue with the aforementioned behavior about 8-10 years ago in the implementation of a synchronization primitive.

On arm64 atomics with an acquire then later memory operations can move before the store, however the store needs to succeed as if it doesn't then we will execute the load-acquire again.

Won't that cause problems for stable/15 when stable/16 is branched?

Rebase + update comments

I'm just trying to keep things out of early boot if they don't need to be there.