Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Add sbintime.9 manual page
Needs ReviewPublic

Authored by khng on Sun, Jun 28, 9:36 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F161460667: D57931.diff
Sat, Jul 4, 12:43 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Jul 3, 5:18 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 4:15 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 8:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 8:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 8:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 8:14 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Jul 2, 8:14 AM
Subscribers

Details

Reviewers
imp
ziaee
Group Reviewers
manpages
Summary

sbintime.9 is a manual page that documents the usage of sbintime_t and
its helper functions.

MFC after: 1 week

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Skipped
Unit
Tests Skipped
Build Status
Buildable 74366
Build 71249: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

khng requested review of this revision.Sun, Jun 28, 9:36 PM
share/man/man9/sbintime.9
2–25

This is the updated preferred license in our license guide and style.9

khng marked an inline comment as done.

Addressed ziaee@'s comments.

Found another minor grammatical nit. I don't really understand enough to know why we would choose "a" or "the" for these. Also, would you please "Relnotes: yes" this?

share/man/man9/sbintime.9
65

We usually use imperative tone across our docs

71
78

ditto

85

ditto

91

ditto

96

ditto

102

ditto

107

ditto

113

ditto

118

ditto

125

ditto

132

ditto

139

ditto

khng marked 13 inline comments as done.

Addressed ziaee@'s comments.

Editorial looks good from manpages but I'd wait for someone who understands sbintime to review also. Thanks for writing this!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Mon, Jun 29, 1:40 AM
markj added inline comments.
share/man/man9/sbintime.9
62

IMO it'd be helpful to state the unit: the lower 32 bits are counting with a base unit of 1/2^{32} seconds, so (sbintime_t)0x1 corresponds to ~0.25ns. At least, that's my understanding.

150

Probably at least bintime.9 and callout.9 should link back to this page.

khng marked 2 inline comments as done.

Incorporate markj@'s suggestions.

This revision now requires review to proceed.Sat, Jul 4, 11:08 AM