I will commit this.

In D30050#793887, @pauamma_gundo.com wrote:

Doesn't explain why the manpages group reviewer.

Works on the 10.0.20348.524 Hyper-V hypervisor, with AMD Epyc 7443 CPU.

Superseded by https://reviews.freebsd.org/D34444.

Hi. Here is my most recent snapshot: https://github.com/khng300/freebsd-src/commit/d05aa814f33f003ac12c1631bd69a2e90ddb0401 .

Is anyone going to merge this?

In D34097#771358, @bojan.novkovic_fer.hr wrote:

In D34097#771212, @khng wrote:

Do you think fattach binding to a file in the file system namespace is a necessary characteristic that we need to replicate as well? If not, I think another less-compatible approach is to separate the namespace all together, just like the posixshm facilities.

I don't think that it is a necessary part for the IPC mechanism itself and that it is mostly needed for compatibility.
Separating the namespace sounds like a good idea, and I would be more than glad to update the differential using this approach if you think it is the way to go.

It sounds like a better idea to me to not interact with file system namespace, thus there will be no hassle dealing with file system events like mount/unmount. I am not sure if others oppose this approach though.

Do you think fattach binding to a file in the file system namespace is a necessary characteristic that we need to replicate as well? If not, I think another less-compatible approach is to separate the namespace all together, just like the posixshm facilities.

Oops.

Hmm, osdep/PortMapper.cpp is not being compiled into -one. I need to investigate it further.