A few minor changes and it is ready to merge.
Thanks for your report!

A few changes and it is ready to merge. Thanks for your report!

Approved, thanks!

A few small fixes and it is ready to merge.
Thanks!

In D53824#1242870, @salvadore wrote:

Another case in which using variables in WWW makes sense is for master/slave ports or ports that are very similar (e.g. the GCC ports, which do not follow the master/slave model at least for now, but have indeed very similar Makefiles). Assume for example software foo comes in different versions and we want to point WWW to different urls depending on those versions, we could do something like WWW= https://foo.com/${DISTVERSION}.

Since I have been put in the reviewers, let me add my two cents.

Approved, thanks!

A few small fixes and it is ready to merge.
Thanks for you report!

A few small changes and it is ready for merge. The report also needs to have one sentence per line (I can do it at merge time if you prefer).
Thanks!

A few small changes and it is ready for merge. The report also needs to have one sentence per line (I can do it at merge time if you prefer).
Thanks!

Approved, thanks!

Approved, thanks!

Calls for status reports sent to developers@ in BCC on the 15th of December have arrived successfully.
So this change is not necessary anymore and I abandon the revision.

I have added bapt and pi to the reviewers as postmaster members because the issue probably started with some recent change in developers mailing list configuration. Now they are aware and can have a word about it if they want. But I do not think that the configuration should be changed: I believe stop sending status reports to developers@ is the right solution.

Revision's link and revision's author referenced in the mailing list: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-doc-all/2025-November/004816.html

Merged with changes as https://cgit.freebsd.org/doc/commit/?id=ecd8cc0702da9d3fff4c8b18d2c9236d48cdea83 (forgot to put it in the commit message, sorry)

Thanks you very much for your report.
In addition to the various inline comments I made, we require reports to put one sentence per line. I can do it and also make the other fixes at merge time if you prefer.

Approved once the small fix is done, thanks!

Approved once the repetition is removed, thank!

In D53198#1215248, @freebsd_ny-central.org wrote:

• bugmeister (optional, ok)

This is one of the last files that we commit when we publish the report and, as usual, we are still waiting for many late reports. So feel free to modify the file directly in this review as much as you need.