see D53894

In D43399#1179757, @christos wrote:

Please rebase all relevant patches, including this one, on top of main, stack them properly, and also re-generate and update the diffs with full context: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Phabricator#Create_a_Revision_via_Web_Interface

This looks like an older review for

looks OK, but tagging for srcmgr review since some of it looks weird too :)

code looks OK, though my arm assembler is rusty. tagged as srcmgr for review

srcmgr review, likely OK, but not actually accepted.

Wonder what the status of this is... Tagging for srcmgr review, even though it didn't make it to accepted.

tagging for srcmgr review. These are all likely a sea of conflicts now, but that should be easy to resolve.

Looks like this would be easy to forward port. But the patch series likely needs some work. tagging for srcmgr review.

This isn't in current. Tagging for further review by srcmgr.
It's looking, though, like an incomplete patch that maybe should be closed.

This appears to have landed in slightly modified form in the following. Any lingering open issues should be addressed in a new review.

Please rebase all relevant patches, including this one, on top of main, stack them properly, and also re-generate and update the diffs with full context: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Phabricator#Create_a_Revision_via_Web_Interface

Can you please:

• Rebase it on top of the current main branch.
• Generate the diffs with full context git diff -U999999.
• Organize the commit message, test plan and additional notes. Things are a bit all over the place now.

vybrid case it might be time to remove that one soon - some of the drivers seems to be used as base for the layerscape SoC for example D44020.
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=ba9f8eeb478975069b644f2228808d5e0c0dc1b1

they should be in GENERIC if able (or at lease something tinderbox would build).