User Details
- User Since
- May 14 2014, 3:42 PM (593 w, 2 d)
Today
Pong. This one looks good too. :)
Yesterday
Thank you. And I'm glad to see upstream getting more in sync with us. ;-)
Thu, Sep 25
Wed, Sep 24
Wow. That's a blast from the past.
Tue, Sep 23
Thanks for clarifying.
This makes sense. Thank you.
Sun, Sep 21
Wed, Sep 17
Mon, Sep 1
This is good. And it passes the test in D52241.
Sun, Aug 31
Sat, Aug 30
- Check failed: /home/philip/freebsd/src/lib/libc/tests/stdtime/detect_tz_changes_test.c:96: expect != buf (-0700 (PDT) != +0000 (-00))
This looks good. Thank you!
Aug 27 2025
This compiles and the "git diff" output against upstream and against main looks plausible. I have not checked every line of the diff with a fine tooth comb. But this can land. I don't think it will break.
Aug 22 2025
This looks good. I agree about strftime.c.
Aug 15 2025
Approved by: philip (mentor)
Aug 9 2025
I tested this in the FreeBSD.org cluster and it works. Many thanks!
Aug 8 2025
Aug 7 2025
I did a cursory review and a quick test. This seems to do what it says on the box. I have not had time for an in-depth review. I think this is good to commit to main before stable/15.
Jul 29 2025
I don't think PowerPC 32 failing is a blocker for main or stable/15: we're ending support for 32 bit platforms. Do we ever plan to merge this to stable/14 though?
Jul 6 2025
Jun 17 2025
May 31 2025
Approved by: philip (mentor)
May 24 2025
May 21 2025
May 20 2025
May 10 2025
Approved by: philip (mentor)
May 9 2025
Approved by: philip (mentor)
May 8 2025
Approved by: philip (mentor)
May 6 2025
May 5 2025
May 4 2025
May 1 2025
Apr 28 2025
I haven't tested this but assuming we do indeed use only interface ioctls, this looks like it should work.
Apr 23 2025
Looks good to me. Thank you for addressing @bz's comments.
Apr 11 2025
Apr 10 2025
Apr 9 2025
Apr 8 2025
I don't know anyone who uses this option. I certainly don't test it. :-)
I don't mind additional documentation.
Apr 7 2025
Apr 6 2025
Apr 5 2025
Apr 4 2025
This looks good to me -- modulo @diizzy's comments.
Apr 2 2025
Apr 1 2025
Mar 31 2025
Thanks for the feedback. That was my reasoning for doing posix_only instead of the tzdata default posix_right.
Mar 30 2025
This builds the "main" format of the time zone database. That includes backward compatibility links but it doesn't include historical ("backzone") data. The "redo" bit controls how leapseconds are handled. We may want this to be posix_right. I'm not sure what other vendors do here.
Mar 29 2025
Thank you for doing this work! At a glance, this looks good enough to give a test-drive on the cluster.
Mar 26 2025
Mar 23 2025
Mar 20 2025
Mar 19 2025
...and remember to update the date stamps and type something in a REVISION... :)
This looks good to me. Go ahead and commit this.