User Details
- User Since
- Sep 28 2014, 7:22 PM (554 w, 4 d)
Wed, May 14
We don't follow MISRA-C, but style(9) does also require this, so the change should be made anyway.
Tue, May 13
It'll want an entry in UPDATING too. I have no strong views about doing this in this commit or a subsequent one.
Fri, May 9
Thu, May 8
Mon, May 5
Sat, May 3
Fri, May 2
Thu, May 1
Wed, Apr 30
(Work by Luiz Souza <luiz@netgate.com>)
Tue, Apr 29
Mon, Apr 28
LGTM. Ship it!
Approved. Commit it before I import more patches and force you to rebase again ;)
Thu, Apr 24
https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/advanced-networking/
"If the bridge host needs an IP address, set it on the bridge interface, not on the member interfaces."
I'm very happy to see this work, not so much for the performance improvement (although we're not going to say no to that!), but because users keep getting caught out when they assign addresses to bridge member interfaces. That breaks multicast, for example, which is bad for IPv4 and catastrophic for IPv6. This has been documented for a long time, but users keep doing it anyway. Making it impossible will save a lot of frustration.
Wed, Apr 23
Oh, and I'd prefix the title with 'pf:' rather than 'pfctl:', because it includes kernel changes as well as pfctl changes.
I think we're about ready to have users try to break this.
Please fix the man page typo and date, and then it's approved to commit.
Mon, Apr 21
in this case ifconfig(8) defaults to the 'link' address family instead of the 'inet' address family.