- Queries
- All Stories
- Search
- Advanced Search
- Transactions
- Transaction Logs
Advanced Search
Apr 20 2019
Apr 16 2019
Apr 15 2019
Apr 14 2019
Apr 2 2019
Mar 27 2019
Committed updated version in rP496935
Mar 26 2019
Mar 25 2019
Mar 11 2019
Thank you for the insight @tuexen
Mar 6 2019
Feb 26 2019
Format the review SUMMARY field like a well-formatted commit log message. Primarily that is:
Thank you for this @tuexen!
Feb 15 2019
Looks good, happy for you to proceed if you're comfortable/confident with the changeset.
Feb 1 2019
Jan 28 2019
Syntax changes look ok, please confirm that this change passes QA (I've added items to the TEST PLAN section of this review)
Jan 27 2019
Replace 'elasticache' typo with 'elasticsearch'
Jan 26 2019
Please confirm this also passes portlint
Jan 25 2019
@jhixson Could you please add the full port/diff context to the review please. I'm under the impression arc diff create created full file context unless --less-context was used, so not sure why/how there's no full context here. Maybe its a default config file or something.
Hmm, can't see port contents in the diff, something up with Phabricator?
Jan 22 2019
Jan 12 2019
It's not that 2.7+ is "better", its that :3.6 is "incorrect" in that:
Jan 7 2019
Jan 4 2019
Jan 2 2019
In D18566#399201, @cem wrote:In D18566#399196, @koobs wrote:Change looks fine, thanks for commenting/referencing the patches/sources
Happy to accept after confirmation of QA, particularly as this change will be MFH'd.
Thanks Kubilay. As noted in the PR, "It builds and basic functions seem fine." I don't know of any better QA tests than connecting to my rdesktop server, do you?
Note also this is:
Change looks fine, thanks for commenting/referencing the patches/sources
Jan 1 2019
Dec 31 2018
Dec 30 2018
Reviewed_by: koobs
Approved by: koobs
Approved by: portmgr (blanket: build/run fixes, ports compliance)
Dec 22 2018
Previous were just questions, thanks for commenting. Review previously (and still) accepted
Dec 21 2018
Dec 18 2018
Dec 14 2018
Dec 13 2018
Dec 12 2018
Dec 4 2018
Nov 28 2018
Nov 27 2018
In D17459#388854, @loader wrote:In D17459#388221, @koobs wrote:Please also include the updates to any ports that use these OPTIONS in their Makefile's already (thereby leveraging the new shared descriptions)
Do I also need to add RSYNC_DESC, DARCS_DESC and BAZAAR_DESC into bsd.options.desc.mk?
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/ocaml-opam/Makefile?revision=483093&view=markup#l30
30 RSYNC_DESC= Remote repository synchronized with Rsync 31 GIT_DESC= Remote repository synchronized with git 32 HG_DESC= Remote repository synchronized with mercurial 33 DARCS_DESC= Remote repository synchronized with darcshttps://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/devel/cvs2svn/Makefile?revision=479407&view=markup#l30
30 SUBVERSION_DESC= Build with subversion support 31 GIT_DESC= Build with git support 32 BAZAAR_DESC= Build with Bazaar supportIf we are going to change all these descriptions, I should open a Bugzilla report to get an approval from the maintainer for the ports like devel/ocaml-opam, right?
Nov 23 2018
Changes to Mk/bsd.options.desc.mk don't explicitly require (block on) portmgr approval
Please also include the updates to any ports that use these OPTIONS in their Makefile's already (thereby leveraging the new shared descriptions)
Nov 14 2018
Nov 9 2018
Nov 7 2018
Nov 6 2018
Nov 4 2018
In D17821#381041, @0mp wrote:Is there a reason why USE_PYTHON=concurrent is not added to every port?
py-buildbot{-worker} Update RUN_DEPENDS, Add patch comment
Nov 3 2018
devel/py-buildbot{-*}: Add extra TEST_DEPENDS, Fix test targets