Do we support only vnodes then (dragonflybsd does it too btw) ?
Just curious, why your kernel implementation had not been accepted at the time @mjg ?
So what do we do @kib ?

manpage feedback changes.

implementation concealed in the userland part only instead.

indeed :)

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=257963

ping :)

ping :)

In D22292#487603, @gerald wrote:

Fixed patch (option helpers need to come earlier in the Makefile) that I am testing now.

I started with one gcc flavour only to see if it can appeal.

Little update as maintainer :-)

In D20875#452320, @tcberner wrote:

sysutils/daggy seems to be broken by the update

Related ticket https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231792

Adding "hotfix" patch which unmounted one of the base folders before the application had a chance to load its contents.

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231109

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227353

Fair enough @tobik I ll do necessary changes later on. I m not ignoring comments just was waiting for more reviews.

In D15310#328652, @mat wrote:

In D15310#324443, @devnexen_gmail.com wrote:

ping :)

In D15310#328644, @devnexen_gmail.com wrote:

ping

Not exactly sure what you are ping'ing about.
I had a quick look and the port looks ok.

Now, it looks like you are not a committer, so you cannot add this yourself. You should probably go and open a PR on our bugzilla so that the port gets into the pipeline and gets added to the repository.

ping

ping :)

Makes sense, last week I co-authored the OpenBSD package, I need to adjust to FreeBSD specificities :-) thanks for the feedback will bring update later on the day.

I see. In fact we re just registered (at the moment) as certified nginx plus modules

I understand your point (and I wish it was different but I m just the developer), no worries.