Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Convert consumers to vm_page_alloc_noobj_contig()
ClosedPublic

Authored by markj on Sep 17 2021, 2:17 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 23, 11:20 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Nov 22, 12:30 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 14, 5:03 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Nov 9, 8:38 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Nov 7, 4:59 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Nov 5, 10:22 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 23 2024, 6:52 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Oct 17 2024, 2:24 PM

Details

Summary

Remove now-unneeded page zeroing. No functional change intended.

Diff Detail

Repository
rG FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

markj requested review of this revision.Sep 17 2021, 2:17 PM
hselasky added a subscriber: hselasky.

Looks good, assuming zero handling is preserved.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Sep 17 2021, 2:30 PM
sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c
337

I observe that you eliminated VM_ALLOC_NOBUSY here but not elsewhere. Why?

sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c
337

No good reason. I think it makes sense to simply drop the VM_ALLOC_NOBUSY flag from all callers, as it is already implied by VM_ALLOC_NOOBJ.

sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c
337

I agree.

Drop unused VM_ALLOC_NOBUSY from consumers.

This revision now requires review to proceed.Sep 17 2021, 7:08 PM

Drop uses of VM_ALLOC_NORMAL from vm_page_alloc_noobj_contig() and
vm_page_alloc_noobj_contig_domain() callers.

kib added inline comments.
sys/arm/nvidia/drm2/tegra_bo.c
105–106

The variable becomes somewhat pointless. You can directly pass _WIRED|_ALLOC_ZERO to vm_page_alloc_noobj_contig(), and vm_page_reclaim_contig() is fine with 0 instead pflags.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 4 2021, 1:47 AM
markj marked an inline comment as done.

Drop an unneeded local variable.

This revision now requires review to proceed.Oct 4 2021, 1:59 AM
alc added inline comments.
sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_page.c
107–109

Is PAGE_SIZE actually correct? I would guess that Linux guarantees that an order n allocation is aligned to an order n address. That said, at the moment, this is probably not an issue because of the way that vm_phys does contig allocations.

sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_radix.c
3576

Does VM_ALLOC_ZERO actually make sense here?

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Oct 17 2021, 1:04 AM
sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_radix.c
3576

It doesn't seem so. I think both of these XXX comments can be resolved by ORing malloc2vm_flags(flags) into req.

sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_page.c
107–109

I can't find any Linux documentation or code that definitively answers this. Looking at the alloc_pages() implementation, it does seem to return self-aligned runs in practice, but I can't tell if this is a guarantee of the interface. alloc_contig_pages() has a comment stating that self-alignment is guaranteed if the size of the run is a power of 2, but this function is not used much.

Use malloc2vm_flags() in radix_pgd_import().

This revision now requires review to proceed.Oct 17 2021, 9:15 PM
This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.Oct 27 2021, 3:00 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.