User Details
- User Since
- Oct 23 2024, 6:07 PM (50 w, 5 d)
Sat, Oct 11
On Sat Oct 11, 2025 at 2:26 AM +0300, Steve Kargl wrote:
I do not have a phabricator account. That method to
review patches came after I stopped committing.I did look at your patch, and do believe that it
is the correct fix. If you compare to remainderf(),
you'll see that the float version considers the
entire significand. I also checked remainderl().
It calls remquol() and it's implementation is
much different than the float and double versions.
Fri, Oct 10
Will do. I tried to add him to the review before uploading the patch but couldn't find an account.
Wed, Oct 1
Tue, Sep 30
Allocate fifo before locking priv->mtx
malloc priv->events with the correct size
Mon, Sep 29
Thu, Sep 25
I don't have the hardware to test this, but cross referencing the documentation, it looks good to me.
Bump
Userspace GPIO interrupts are currently broken because of this. (after D51932)
I believe that we do need to implement the resource allocation functions too (for cross-tree consumers), just not on the GPIO controller.
Wed, Sep 24
No problem :)
Tue, Sep 23
Sun, Sep 21
Sat, Sep 20
Thu, Sep 18
LGTM, just one nit.
Wed, Sep 17
No worries.
Mon, Sep 15
I got toolchain errors when running the script for amd64, but I verified that it does actually build with MK_LOADER_BIOS_TEXTONLY=no on amd64.
Bumping
This seems important, should make it to 15.0
Sun, Sep 14
Sep 10 2025
Sep 9 2025
Return actual errno values in other code paths.
The BIOS loader uses -Wall, but I'm not sure about the rest.
Ah, I don't mind. :)
Sep 8 2025
Remove redundant initialization
Most errors generated by this are trivial to fix. I just opened reviews for the ones that weren't.
Sep 3 2025
Aug 31 2025
This fixes the BUS_DELETED_CHILD call for acpi_gpiobus. I think it might be papering over a bug though.
When device_delete_child is called, say with device_delete_child(gpio0, gpiobus0), it calls device_detach on gpiobus0. It then goes through it's children and recursively calls device_delete_child on them. When one of these children reach the BUS_CHILD_DELETED call, gpiobus0 has already been detached, so the call never reaches it's implementation.
The inline comments are in wildly incorrect places now, I'm not sure if I can fix that.