Active Repositories
Recent Activity
Today
Thank you both so much!
Sample output:
[root@ftsr1] [~] # route -n6 add -net 3fff::/64 -gateway 2a01:e140:10:10::1 -weight 1
add net 3fff::/64: gateway 2a01:e140:10:10::1 fib 0
[root@ftsr1] [~] # route -n6 add -net 3fff::/64 -gateway 2a01:e140:10:10::2 -weight 2
add net 3fff::/64: gateway 2a01:e140:10:10::2 fib 0
[root@ftsr1] [~] # route -n6 add -net 3fff::/64 -gateway 2a01:e140:10:10::3 -weight 3 -expire +3
add net 3fff::/64: gateway 2a01:e140:10:10::3 fib 0
[root@ftsr1] [~] # route -on6 get 3fff::/64
route to: 3fff::
destination: 3fff::
mask: ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::
fib: 0
flags: <UP,GATEWAY,DONE,STATIC>
nhops: 3
via: gw 2a01:e140:10:10::1 iface vtnet0 weight 1 mtu 1500 table inet6.0
via: gw 2a01:e140:10:10::2 iface vtnet0 weight 2 mtu 1500
via: gw 2a01:e140:10:10::3 iface vtnet0 weight 3 mtu 1500 expire 1In D56173#1285318, @mark_freebsdfoundation.org wrote:@ziaee I know this has dropped OK, but just wanted to say, don't get rid of baseof.html! I'm fairly sure it is the root of the whole template for Hugo. https://gohugo.io/templates/new-templatesystem-overview/#example-folder-structure
Thanks for the patch!
Approved.
For reviewers: this patch also fixes a panic caused by an incorrect assumption in nhgrp_get_addition_group().
That function assumes rnd->rnd_nhop is not an nhgrp_object, therefore sending two or more RTA_MULTIPATH attributes can trigger a panic.
I don't see it committed?
9fd978680db649 (Baptiste Daroussin 2024-01-04 15:09:44 +0100 5015) SYSCTL_PROC(_security_jail, OID_AUTO, mlock_allowed, 9fd978680db649 (Baptiste Daroussin 2024-01-04 15:09:44 +0100 5016) CTLTYPE_INT | CTLFLAG_RW | CTLFLAG_MPSAFE, 9fd978680db649 (Baptiste Daroussin 2024-01-04 15:09:44 +0100 5017) NULL, PR_ALLOW_MLOCK, sysctl_jail_default_allow, "I", 9fd978680db649 (Baptiste Daroussin 2024-01-04 15:09:44 +0100 5018) "Processes in jail can lock/unlock physical pages in memory");
I was wrong. It is committed. It just needs to be closed here. I do not see a way to close. Maybe I'm blind... the only thing I found was abandoning this revision.
This looks pretty good.
Yes, it waits for me to remember that this is not committed...
Yeez, that was a bad shot from the hip. Sorry about that.
For tests, see D56190.
Hi, thanks for taking this on, it would be nice to see this conversion completed.