Sigh.

Fix build on i386.

Mk2

And yes, I'll update the other tables too, once I'm convinced to not discard the idea instead :-)

In D33967#768557, @pauamma_gundo.com wrote:

In D33967#768353, @trasz wrote:

Btw, if portsnap is deprecated, should we perhaps mention it in the man page?

In the -current manual page, at least. Probably MFC that to the -stable releases where it's being removed as well, I guess.

In D33982#768626, @debdrup wrote:

Seems fine, but I hope you're checking with nc -z from freefall.f.o if they're working. ;)

But there's already a link to it...?

It's been removed from stable/13, from what I can see. Not in stable/12, though, and it's still there for users of 13.0-RELEASE. I'd personally lean towards removing it, because it's not a feature or functionality being removed - rather, it's removal of specific way of getting to that functionality, making users use using svnlite(1) instead of installing svn(1) from packages, which is something they will do anyway after they upgrade, so why not switch sooner?

In D33971#768179, @carlavilla wrote:

Thanks for this.
But before making the commit. Why the freebsdmall should be removed? The service it’s active.

It was added in d9ed34de4f; I've just sent an email.

I think this is a slightly different situation, because svnlite has already been removed from 14-CURRENT. Portsnap is still there.

You're definitely not the only one, however, is the Mirrors chapter really the best place to put them? Given that they are already described in the chapter dedicated to mailing lists?

(Never mind the previous comment; no changes planned, I've got reviews mixed up.)

Thanks! There is a problem with Bulgaria ("{mirrors-bulgaria-ftp-http} / {mirrors-bulgaria-ftp-httpv6}"), but it was there before; I'll try to investigate later.

In D33909#766811, @debdrup wrote:

After a40cf4175c901 that you implemented last year, is a privileged prompt necessary, or would it be better to recommend using unprivileged chroot after toggling the sysctl OID?

If you prefer the handbook to recommend privileged chroot, it looks good to me as is.