This landed as port of another review.

This one had orphaned files, I fixed pkg-plist for you.

• Fix typo.

The debuginfo is installed into ${LOCALBASE}/lib/debug/ now and I taught both GDB and LLDB to look into there.

@brooks You might be interested in the LLDB change.

• devel/llvm15: Patch lldb to search for debug symbols in LOCALBASE/lib/debug.

• Reuse existing script for generating external debugging symbols.
• devel/gdb: Point to LOCALBASE/lib/debug dir for the debugging symbols.

• Create DESCR.debuginfo on the fly.
• Fix typo.

In D43509#992529, @tijl wrote:

In D43509#992501, @arrowd wrote:

What I don't like about this change is creation of many ports. This looks like an ideal case to apply subpackages.

Each port has its own version number and release dates so subpackages don't really fit. The CJK and emoji fonts also have a different master site. I think separate ports fits better.

The Linux distributions are creating subpackages from a 1GiB distfile that is released every month, but their users are used to installing binary packages and don't care about build times or distfile sizes. FreeBSD users expect to be able to build their own packages and do care about such things. Also note that most fonts aren't updated every month, e.g. Noto Sans was last released in September. So with subpackages users would be rebuilding the fonts every month often without getting any updates to the fonts they have installed.

In D43509#992428, @diizzy wrote:

In general I'm not in favour of re-rolling our own dist files because it mainly relies on a single person and that person wont be around forever or will always be available and it's most more convenient to use the same tarball as everyone else in terms of availability.