Per Wikipedia, ACPI WMI support is available on all x86* platforms
and ARM platforms. Add the source to files.arm64 so code that relies
on its headers (thunderbolt(4) for instance), can be built on ARM64.
Details
Details
This passes make universe.
This is a part of my larger attempt/effort to see how much of my Apple Silicon-based machine boots with FreeBSD CURRENT, but this is also a requirement for building thunderbolt(4) on ARM64.
This particular change has not been runtime tested yet.
Diff Detail
Diff Detail
- Repository
- rG FreeBSD src repository
- Lint
Lint Not Applicable - Unit
Tests Not Applicable
Event Timeline
| sys/conf/files.arm64 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 209 | Not sure why it's standard on x86 (that's where I copied the line from), but this should be "optional acpi". | |
| sys/conf/files.arm64 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 209 | It should be under optional acpi as the kernel cam be built without ACPI support, e.g. using FDT. | |
| sys/conf/files.arm64 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 209 | Ah, yes. I forgot to update the diff -- thank you for the reminder :). | |
Comment Actions
Build the .m when acpi/acpi_wmi are explicitly requested. Don't make it
part of the standard kernel.
As @andrew rightly noted, ARM64 can be built without ACPI (FDT-based
platforms). I discovered shortly after posting the diff as the LINT-FDT
kernel target build failed make tinderbox :D.
Comment Actions
I want to give @jkim some time to look at this since the acpi_wmi part of the diff might be unnecessary.