sysctl has not -R option

[asiciliano]

Summary

This commit 244106 implemented -T and -W options but -R was added to the manual page (.Sh SYNOPSIS).

Test Plan

% sysctl -Ra
sysctl: illegal option -- R
usage: sysctl [-bdehiNnoqTtWx] [ -B <bufsize> ] [-f filename] name[=value] ...
       sysctl [-bdehNnoqTtWx] [ -B <bufsize> ] -a

[0mp]

Nice find!

[crees]

I think it should be NRTbdehnotqx, shouldn't it? I'm sure most of our manpages are like that.

[0mp]

In D19012#406455, @crees wrote:

I think it should be NRTbdehnotqx, shouldn't it? I'm sure most of our manpages are like that.

It depends. ls(1) has -ABab while grep(1) has -AaBb. Personally, I prefer -AaBb. It's also what the example for the Fl macro suggests in mdoc(7):

.Op Fl 1AaCcdFfgHhikLlmnopqRrSsTtux

[imp]

In D19012#406701, @0mp wrote:

In D19012#406455, @crees wrote:

I think it should be NRTbdehnotqx, shouldn't it? I'm sure most of our manpages are like that.

It depends. ls(1) has -ABab while grep(1) has -AaBb. Personally, I prefer -AaBb. It's also what the example for the Fl macro suggests in mdoc(7):

.Op Fl 1AaCcdFfgHhikLlmnopqRrSsTtux

The official style is AaBbCc not ABCabc. This is true for both the usage() message in the program and the usage in the man page. longopts are a total crap shoot, we have no standard for those, but single letter ops are well known: alphabetical order, with the upper case of the letter immediately before the lower case.

[asiciliano]

Thank you all for the comments,
Could you commit the diff? Thanks.

[ygy]

I will go ahead and commit it.