This changes the resulting package for go. Need a PORTREVISION bump?

It saddens me but I understand. Thanks for checking with me.

Thanks!

In D42070#960269, @des wrote:

In D42070#960267, @bdrewery wrote:

What is the motivation for dropping ca_root_nss?

It's not needed. We've shipped a fully populated trust root in base since 12.2.

This doesn’t seem right. I’m away from computer today so can’t verify. What is the motivation for dropping ca_root_nss?

I mention "style" which is from style(9) man style. Accepted pending style fixes.

I didn't mean to "accept as portmgr".

@markj Great, thanks!

This vdso thing happens when building releng/12.3 as well. Edit: I suppose it will happen on any older builds but this branch is at least still supported.