FYI, I've submitted a patch for exp-run. Please see PR 240425.
Sep 14 2023
Sep 10 2019
Sep 8 2019
Jun 3 2019
Jun 2 2019
May 7 2019
mention rubygem-dbm in lang/ruby26/pkg-message
Apr 19 2019
Sep 20 2018
Actually, now that I look at it more, I like your solution better. I'll do some testing and commit this.
Oh, and for reference, this was originally done in ports svn r407788.
Here's my proposed updated diff. Greg, can you confirm this works for you? I'll try to evaluate if this has a negative impact on other gem packages. I don't think it will need and exp-run because worst case it should just mean we package up extra files that we don't want in a few cases.
Looks like I have to commandeer the revision in order to update it.
Aug 2 2018
Jul 30 2018
Yes, I was thinking along the same lines, I currently have 1668 rubygems-* ports, if only one behaves differently, maybe it should be fixed.
Maybe the problematic ports should be fixed instead.
Jul 28 2018
Jul 27 2018
Jul 25 2018
Exp-run looks fine, please approve
Jul 21 2018
Jul 19 2018
This makes sense, but I think we should request an exp-run.
Mar 7 2018
Jan 31 2018
Regenerate with devel/arcanist