Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Update sysutils/uefi-edk2-bhyve for edk2-stable202111
ClosedPublic

Authored by bcran on Dec 12 2021, 9:09 PM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F174195862: D33391.diff
Thu, Oct 1, 7:18 AM
F174157280: D33391.id99888.diff
Thu, Oct 1, 12:16 AM
F174156866: D33391.id99885.diff
Thu, Oct 1, 12:11 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 27, 4:05 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 12, 4:02 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 11, 7:59 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Sep 10, 11:54 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Sep 6, 12:00 AM

Details

Reviewers
mat
gerald
rgrimes
araujo
0mp
bcr
Group Reviewers
bhyve
Summary

Upstream TianoCore has tagged edk2-stable202111. Update the port
to use the release.

Diff Detail

Repository
rP FreeBSD ports repository
Lint
No Lint Coverage
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 43298
Build 40186: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

bcran requested review of this revision.Dec 12 2021, 9:09 PM
bcran created this revision.

Is it valid to reset PORTEPOCH to 1 when updating the PORTVERSION?

Is it valid to reset PORTEPOCH to 1 when updating the PORTVERSION?

No. PORTEPOCH never must go back, see https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/makefiles/index.html#makefile-portepoch which says

"PORTEPOCH must never be decreased or reset to zero, because that would cause comparison to a package from an earlier epoch to fail. [...] Dropping or resetting PORTEPOCH incorrectly leads to no end of grief."

Could I get approval from a port committer for this please?

Oh, sorry. I though you actually are a ports committer and hence only briefly provided feedback.

I had another look, and this looks fine (= "Approved, thank you") assuming you tested this.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Dec 21 2021, 10:01 PM
michaelo added a subscriber: michaelo.

Closing since this has been overcome already.