Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7
ClosedPublic

Authored by 0mp on Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F163116012: D25847.id75048.diff
Mon, Jul 20, 5:10 AM
F163088456: D25847.id75297.diff
Sun, Jul 19, 11:41 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Jul 15, 8:25 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Jul 15, 6:00 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Tue, Jul 14, 2:08 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sun, Jul 12, 12:16 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Jul 8, 1:07 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Jul 4, 11:32 AM

Details

Summary
Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7

As we are moving away from portsnap, let's not recommend it in the manual page.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 32602
Build 30058: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

0mp requested review of this revision.Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM

Good to go into the tree. Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 28 2020, 10:45 AM

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

I've been hearing "git".

@bjk wrote:

I've been hearing "git".

You've heard wrong, it's svn.

I was trying to catch up with r54379 and r54378.

I'm still waiting for the portmgr though to confirm that this change is fine.

mat added a subscriber: mat.

yeah, looks good.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.