Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7
ClosedPublic

Authored by 0mp on Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
F171128820: D25847.id75297.diff
Tue, Sep 8, 9:26 PM
F171100148: D25847.diff
Tue, Sep 8, 5:05 PM
F171082370: D25847.id75050.diff
Tue, Sep 8, 2:31 PM
F171000790: D25847.id75048.diff
Tue, Sep 8, 2:57 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Sep 5, 1:04 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 10:59 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 4:50 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Fri, Sep 4, 4:19 AM

Details

Summary
Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7

As we are moving away from portsnap, let's not recommend it in the manual page.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Passed
Unit
No Test Coverage
Build Status
Buildable 32602
Build 30058: arc lint + arc unit

Event Timeline

0mp requested review of this revision.Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM

Good to go into the tree. Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 28 2020, 10:45 AM

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

I've been hearing "git".

@bjk wrote:

I've been hearing "git".

You've heard wrong, it's svn.

I was trying to catch up with r54379 and r54378.

I'm still waiting for the portmgr though to confirm that this change is fine.

mat added a subscriber: mat.

yeah, looks good.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.