Page MenuHomeFreeBSD
Differential D25847

Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by 0mp on Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM.
Tags
None
Referenced Files
Unknown Object (File)
Thu, Mar 12, 8:05 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Wed, Mar 11, 5:25 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 9, 7:43 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 9, 4:32 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Sat, Mar 7, 6:12 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 2, 2:51 PM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 2, 9:06 AM
Unknown Object (File)
Mon, Mar 2, 3:26 AM
View All Files
Subscribers
bapt
bjk
danfe
imp
mat
rpokala
portmgr

Details

Reviewers
bcr
Group Reviewers
manpages
portmgr
Commits
rS363798: Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7
Summary
Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7

As we are moving away from portsnap, let's not recommend it in the manual page.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

0mp created this revision.Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM
Herald added a reviewer: manpages. · View Herald TranscriptJul 28 2020, 10:08 AM
Herald added a subscriber: imp. · View Herald Transcript
0mp requested review of this revision.Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM
Harbormaster completed remote builds in B32601: Diff 75048.Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM
0mp updated this revision to Diff 75050.Jul 28 2020, 10:09 AM

Wording

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B32602: Diff 75050.Jul 28 2020, 10:09 AM
0mp added subscribers: bapt, portmgr.Jul 28 2020, 10:09 AM
bcr accepted this revision.Jul 28 2020, 10:45 AM

Good to go into the tree. Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 28 2020, 10:45 AM
rpokala added a subscriber: rpokala.Jul 30 2020, 12:17 AM

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

bjk added a subscriber: bjk.Jul 30 2020, 12:52 AM
In D25847#573331, @rpokala wrote:

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

I've been hearing "git".

danfe added a subscriber: danfe.Jul 30 2020, 6:50 AM
@bjk wrote:

I've been hearing "git".

You've heard wrong, it's svn.

0mp added a reviewer: portmgr.Jul 31 2020, 9:10 AM

I was trying to catch up with r54379 and r54378.

I'm still waiting for the portmgr though to confirm that this change is fine.

mat accepted this revision as: portmgr.Aug 3 2020, 12:18 PM
mat added a subscriber: mat.

yeah, looks good.

Closed by commit rS363798: Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7 (authored by 0mp). · Explain WhyAug 3 2020, 1:12 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
0mp added a commit: rS363798: Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

PathSize
head/
share/
man/
man7/
9 lines

Diff 75297

View Options

head/share/man/man7/ports.7

Loading...