Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7
ClosedPublic

Authored by 0mp on Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM.

Details

Summary
Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7

As we are moving away from portsnap, let's not recommend it in the manual page.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable.
Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.

Event Timeline

0mp requested review of this revision.Jul 28 2020, 10:08 AM

Good to go into the tree. Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Jul 28 2020, 10:45 AM

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

I've been hearing "git".

@bjk wrote:

I've been hearing "git".

You've heard wrong, it's svn.

I was trying to catch up with r54379 and r54378.

I'm still waiting for the portmgr though to confirm that this change is fine.

mat added a subscriber: mat.

yeah, looks good.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.