Page MenuHomeFreeBSD

Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7
ClosedPublic

Authored by 0mp on Tue, Jul 28, 10:08 AM.

Details

Summary
Do not mention portsnap(8) in ports.7

As we are moving away from portsnap, let's not recommend it in the manual page.

Diff Detail

Repository
rS FreeBSD src repository
Lint
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable.
Unit
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.

Event Timeline

0mp created this revision.Tue, Jul 28, 10:08 AM
0mp requested review of this revision.Tue, Jul 28, 10:08 AM
0mp updated this revision to Diff 75050.Tue, Jul 28, 10:09 AM

Wording

bcr accepted this revision.Tue, Jul 28, 10:45 AM

Good to go into the tree. Thanks!

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Tue, Jul 28, 10:45 AM

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

bjk added a subscriber: bjk.Thu, Jul 30, 12:52 AM

As we are moving away from portsnap, ...

We are? What will be the preferred mechanism for updating /usr/ports?

I've been hearing "git".

danfe added a subscriber: danfe.Thu, Jul 30, 6:50 AM
@bjk wrote:

I've been hearing "git".

You've heard wrong, it's svn.

0mp added a reviewer: portmgr.Fri, Jul 31, 9:10 AM

I was trying to catch up with r54379 and r54378.

I'm still waiting for the portmgr though to confirm that this change is fine.

mat accepted this revision as: portmgr.Mon, Aug 3, 12:18 PM
mat added a subscriber: mat.

yeah, looks good.

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.