Seems fine to me. On my laptop gssd is only 36K though and maybe it doesn't warrant a specific package?

In D51486#1176225, @emaste wrote:

Seems fine to me. On my laptop gssd is only 36K though and maybe it doesn't warrant a specific package?

I think that the reasoning is that with this change you can have FreeBSD-gssd installed but no FreeBSD-kerberos* installed, so it's not "let's save 36K for some people" but "let's save whatever FreeBSD-kerberos* weight if I use the port and not the base one"

In D51486#1176225, @emaste wrote:

Seems fine to me. On my laptop gssd is only 36K though and maybe it doesn't warrant a specific package?

in this case i think it's more about the functionality we want to enable with pkgbase: being about to install one thing (gssd) without another thing you don't want (Kerberos command-line), so although the package is fairly small, it does serve a purpose.

that said i don't feel especially strongly about this; we could move it somewhere else (although i'm not sure where off hand) or just leave it where it is if people don't think it needs to move.

or just leave it where it is if people don't think it needs to move

I agree with moving it, was just unsure about a new pkg for it or adding it to something existing if there's something sensible.

In D51486#1176670, @emaste wrote:

I agree with moving it, was just unsure about a new pkg for it or adding it to something existing if there's something sensible.

the only relevant package i can think of is FreeBSD-nfs, but i don't think that's right because KGSSAPI isn't specifically tied to NFS (even if that might be the only thing using it).