Page MenuHomeFreeBSD


Authored by emaste on Jul 29 2015, 9:28 PM.

Diff Detail

rS FreeBSD src repository - subversion
Automatic diff as part of commit; lint not applicable.
Automatic diff as part of commit; unit tests not applicable.

Event Timeline

emaste retitled this revision from to Roll WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_TOOLS into WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN.
emaste updated this object.
emaste edited the test plan for this revision. (Show Details)

UPDATING entry omitted to avoid merge conflicts before D3238 is committed.

1485 ↗(On Diff #7484)

These are for the build tools stage, and should probably not be controlled by MK_TOOLCHAIN. They'd need the equivalent of MK_TOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP, but probably best to just leave them on unconditionally.

15–17 ↗(On Diff #7484)

gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ is only built when MK_TOOLCHAIN == yes so no need to test it here.

emaste added reviewers: imp, brooks.

Rebase and clean up

emaste added inline comments.
1485 ↗(On Diff #7826)

I'm not certain what we should be testing here and below. We want the equivalent of MK_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP for ELF Tool Chain. MK_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP isn't documented, but is enabled unless turned off by setting WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER or if set broken by the arch.

brooks edited edge metadata.
brooks added inline comments.
1485 ↗(On Diff #7826)

I might just use MK_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP since is effectively internal and I think expresses what we want (don't built the non-compiler part of the toolchain). lld may complicate that a bit since it's llvm based and thus will come with clang not with elftoolchain or binutils.

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Aug 12 2015, 8:29 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
1485 ↗(On Diff #7826)

Oops -- see D3381. I committed with the change suggested here, but it's not correct because we force MK_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP off for arm64.